The classic historian has nothing but praise for HBO in Rome. From 2005 to 2007 before the cancellation of season 2, the show featured a live-action takeover of Julius Caesar in the dying days of the Roman Republic. Alongside Ciarán Hinds' Caesar were two leads, Lucius Vorenus (Kevin McKidd) and Titus Pullo (Ray Stevenson), who played two soldiers in Caesar's main army. After the same historical exhibition, They will not diewas released in 2024, the memories of the song HBO received more recognition.
Talking about a Hit History special about exhibits focusing on the Roman Empire, historian Tristan Hughes reviewed the accuracy of in Rome. He reviewed the early scenes of the show as well described the show as “timeless classics“that”ancient historians like“. He reviewed the weapons, which he described as “brilliant“, and say the show is successful “showing indeed… the discipline of these Roman soldiers“. Hughes offered unstinting praise for the classic show:
What the Real Review Means About Rome
Roman Accuracy Led to High Budgets
Hughes didn't share simple ideas about the show's accuracy. Hughes went to great lengths to explain everything he loved from the earliest scenes. In the first battle, he emphasizes the historical importance of Vorenus's whistle but the cleverness of the show's use. He then describes the discipline of the Romans, as exemplified by the beating of Pullo, and describes many cases of similar conduct in the actual Roman Republic. The crucifixion and public flogging may have been consequences of the same sins as Pullo's, adding to the show's didactic appeal.
All that praise is important for a show that advertises itself as faithful to real-world history.
Hughes went on to describe the historical dedication of Vercingetorix and the subsequent Victory, insisting that even the smallest details are based on real-world history. He explains that the red paint on Caesar's face was a symbol of Jupiter, while emphasizing the importance of Caesar's victories and various other achievements in his reign as a military general. All that praise is important for a show that advertises itself as faithful to real-world history.
That little detail explains the show's record-breaking $100 million budgetbut also explains the reasons for its cancellation. HBO was left with a show that had more accurate settings, better weapons, and more realistic city building. However, due to such a large cost, it required large numbers of viewers. The low-grossing show saw success, but not fast enough to save it. It could not survive, leading to early cancellation. in RomeThe end paved the way Game of Thrones' went up in 2011, but it was a disappointing loss.
Our Roman Accuracy
Accuracy Only Makes Rome Better
Although accuracy caused a budget overrun that marked the show's cancellation, in Rome it was a perfect show. That faithfulness to real-world history helps set it apart from other shows set in the Roman Republic. The characters have similar challenges that they may face in life, which makes their tragic stories all the more interesting. The details, including face paint and punishments, helped make the culture feel completely differentwhich certainly helped the perception of the exhibition as a unique image.
Although it was expensive, borrowing from history also made the story completely believable. It remains one of HBO's best shows, as it parallels the lives of historical heroes and those of the soldiers who serve under them. If it had included more anachronistic elements, it might have failed to give that sense of grand scale and faithful portrayal. in Rome it worked because of its accuracy, not in spite of it.
Source: Hit History