Why Reviews for Paddington in Peru Are Much More Divided Than Paddington 2

At first sight, Paddington in Peru appears to be receiving excellent reviews, with a current score of 92% on Rotten Tomatoes. However, when compared with the first two Paddington films, it is clear that reviews of Paddington in Peru in fact, they are much more divided. 2014 Paddington and 2017 Paddington2in comparison, they have Rotten Tomatoes scores of 97% and 99%, respectively. Since Paddington in Peru is still scoring in the 90s, there should be no cause for concern, but upon closer inspection it is clear that some analysis for third Paddington history are much more negative than their predecessors.

The cast of Paddington in Peru features the return of Ben Whishaw voicing the lovable bear, as well as Hugh Bonneville, Madeleine Harris and Samuel Josling as members of the Brown family. This time Emily Mortimer replaced Sally Hawkins as Mrs Brown. When examining the reviews for Paddington and the Brown family’s latest adventure, one notices that the average review score is 7/10, compared to 8.7/10 for Paddington2. This statistic solidifies the fact that comments for Paddington in Peru are much more divided than Paddington2.

Criticism of Paddington in Peru explained

Paddington, Peru, isn’t winning over all its critics

While Paddington in Peru is still receiving respectable reviews, many critics point out that the new film does not compare to the quality of the first two films in the series. of the Empire review of Paddington 3 admires the film for being inspired by Indiana Jones and venturing into the jungles of Peru, but highlights that “little of the charm was lost in traffic.” Similarly, The Hollywood Reporter review points out that Paddington in Peru is a useful sequence, but unfortunately it doesn’t have the “absurdist humor and a decidedly dark edge that elevated the first two Paddington films.“

The reviews above can be considered mixed, if not a little more positive. However, some of Rotten Tomatoes’ top critics absolutely hate it Paddington in Peru. Guilherme Bibbiani The wrap bluntly stated that the newest Paddington film “it stinks.“Comparing Paddington in Peru to the previous two films, he wrote that it is “exactly the kind of tasteless, forgettable slop we probably all expected the Paddington films to be.” Therefore, This review suggests that some fans of the series will be very disappointed with Paddington in Peru.

Paul King’s departure hurt Paddington in Peru

Paul King decided to make Wonka instead of Paddington 3

Want your review Paddington in Peru whether positive or negative, all the critics made a point of mentioning that Paul King, who directed the first two films in the series, did not return for the newest film. Since it was revealed that King would not be returning to Paddington 3it was predictable that this film would not receive as strong reviews as its predecessors. King injected a lot of warmth and charm into the first two Paddington filmsand these are two qualities that seem to be lacking in Paddington in Peru.

Dougal Wilson took over the director’s chair for Paddington in Perureplacing Paul King. Paddington in Peru in fact, it serves as Wilson’s film debut. Before Paddington 3He was known for directing commercials and music videos. Therefore, It’s possible that Wilson simply wasn’t qualified to take control of his beloved Paddington series. Although critics admit that Paddington in Peru is a fun adventure, they emphasize that it lacks several qualities from the first two films.

Paddington, Peru would always struggle to beat Paddington 2

Paddington 2 received almost unanimous positive reviews

However, other than director Paul King’s departure, there is a very obvious reason why Paddington in Peru would always struggle to win over critics: he will forever be compared to Paddington2which many have argued is one of the best films of all time. For many years, Paddington2 in fact, it got a 100% score on Rotten Tomatoesan almost impossible achievement to achieve. Therefore, many people’s expectations are likely to be very high when Paddington in Peruand it may be unfair to compare the new film with the almost perfect Paddington 2.

Furthermore, few trilogies peak with the third film. In truth, it is much more common for the second film in a trilogy to be the most critically acclaimed. The Empire Strikes Back and The Dark Knight are two great examples of this. Therefore, Paddington2 can join the group with the two aforementioned sequences, and Paddington in Peru can join the group that includes people like Return of the Jedi and The Dark Knight Rises. These are still films that are loved by many, but simply can’t live up to the greatness of their immediate predecessor.

Paddington in Peru reviews are still good – what critics like about it

Critics say Paddington, Peru is a fun adventure

Again, it is important to highlight that reviews of Paddington in Peru are still very impressive when compared to most other films. The new Paddington The film follows the titular bear and the Brown family as they travel to Peru to visit Aunt Lucy, and many critics point out that it’s a fun adventure. Furthermore, Paddington in Peru is being praised for telling a new kind of story rather than staying in London and trying to copy the first two films.

As Empire’s analysis points out, Paddington in Peru is clearly inspired by the adventures of Indiana Jones and features many “Scary temples, traps and exotic creatures.” Their review states that children will love it Paddington in Peruwhich is a sentiment emphasized by many other critics. Varieties the review describes Paddington’s latest adventure as “fast, dynamic and surprisingly sunny”. Therefore, even if it does not measure up to the greatness of Paddington2it seems clear that Paddington in Peru It’s still a very fun film.

Sources: Empire, The Hollywood Reporter, The wrap, Variety