Although Gary Larson retired from producing his iconoclastic comic strip The front side At the beginning of 1995, the release of the two-volume Total front side Collection in 2003 allowed him the opportunity to revisit – and in some cases, remaster – his classic cartoons. This included one of his notoriously perplexing comics, the “Slug Worship” panel, which just celebrated its 40th anniversary in June of this year.
The finer details are incredibly important to Gary Larson as an artist. He worked over the details of each panel, more casually than most For side Fans might understand. But at the same time, in order to meet the demands of daily publication, Larson adhered to a strict production schedule – meaning there was often more he could have done with certain cartoons.
with The complete front sideLarson offered the “definitive” versions of his comics – But the discrepancies between versions of some For side Panels pose interesting questions about the humor of the strip, and how readers respond to it.
“Slug worship” version 2.0, explained: how weird is the joke? How funny is it?
Published in The Complete Front Side Volume OneFrom 2003
It is best to first examine the revised version of “Bad Worship” before returning to the original, because this is the version that makes a greater effort – that is, generally – to explain itself to the reader. Although the image is slightly refined, it is almost identical to the version first published in 1984; The main change is the difference in caption. in The complete front side“Slug Worship” is captioned:
It goes without saying that the snitch worshiped their god out of fear, not love.
In this way, Gary Larson explains why the slugs carry their fear of anything that could put them in mortal danger.
It becomes clear that Larson is offering a comedic take on a complex religious question—that is, why do believers still worship a deity who might choose to strike them down. Larson doesn’t seek to answer that question, or even to deal with it that deeply. Instead, his goal is to embody the question within The front side Patented style of humor. As such, this is one of the more overly subjective For side panels; yet, Whether individual readers find it funny or not, the majority will agree that the updated headline makes it easier to engage with.
“Slug Worship” version 1.0, revisited: why it’s so much weirder than V2.0, and (maybe) so much weirder
First published: June 8, 1984
Meaning, as much as the word can be applied to The front sidewas always a result of how the image and caption worked together to convey Gary Larson’s punchline. Or, in some cases, did not work together. When “Slug Warship” first appeared in newspapers in 1984, the image was paired with one of The front side More “confused, thick, esoteric and strange” – as Larson described his own work – captions, requiring much more effort from the reader to piece together the jokes.
The original headline of “Slack Worship” was, in the strictest sense, nonsense:
Alas, Alas! …eeeni-uni vane…
With the context of the updated version of The complete front side In mind, it is much easier to make sense of the purpose of the caption, which is to convey that these are the slugs’ hymn, so to speak. Astute readers of the original print version must have pieced it together – but many readers remained mystified. The second version is unequivocally more understandable, but whether it is funny depends on what readers consider the merits of The front side Humor to be.
That is to say, “Slug Worship V1.0” is more than just potentially harder to “get” than V2.0 – it’s also sillier. The updated caption of V2.0 offers a direct line of insight into what Gary Larson was thinking about, what motivated the creation of the comic. It is thought-provoking, in addition to being amusing. V1.0 may not be as immediately intelligently stimulating, however The alienating effect of the headline could, and did, strike many readers as strangeEven in thewhat?” Way The front side was prone to.
No Version of a Far Side Comic Needs to Be “Better”: What These Changes Can Tell Us
Insight into Gary Larson’s revision process
There are many cases over The complete front side Similar to “Slug Worship,” where comics are tweaked, or in some cases, completely re-done. For readers who engaged with Gary Larson’s work during its original publication run, cataloging the differences is one of the joys of revisiting the author’s collected cartoons. For the discoverer The front side In the afternoon, it is fascinating to realize that The complete front side Does not always contain exactly what first generation readers saw in newspapers.
The idea that improvements to old cartoons would hit him even decades later is a testament to Gary Larson’s creative dexterity.
When you encounter these discrepancies, debating which version of a For side Cartoon is more “effective” or “phonier,” can help fans sharpen their understanding of Larson’s art, it is ultimately more valuable in celebrating the differences for what they have to say about the artist. Gary Larson was relentlessly devoted to the practice of revision; He often drew and crossed even the simplest ones For side comics repeatedly, and his comics’ captions evolved throughout the writing process. The idea that improvements to old cartoons would hit him even decades later is a testament to Gary Larson’s creative dexterity.
An updated version of “The Complete Front Side” would perpetuate the artistic legacy of Gary Larson
In advance of 50 years from the front side
It has been almost forty-five years since The front side It was released in 1980, and the 30th anniversary of Gary Larson’s retirement in 1995 is almost here. The complete front side was produced in 2003, less than a decade after Larson retired – making the collection, which remains an absolute treasure trove for fans of his work, more than two decades old in itself. The enduring popularity of The front sideWhich continues to find new generations of fans all this time later, suggests that an updated version of The complete front side Alone would take it well.
Related
It would be a For side Fan’s dream for an even more massive collection, Which included both the original print versions of each For side comic, as well as the “remastered” version. With even more time to think about his career in retrospect, Gary Larson could perhaps write more of the essays about his work that fill. The complete front side – and could perhaps tweak some more of The front side Cartoons that he didn’t get quite “right” the first time.