WARNING: Major spoilers for Twisters ahead!After 28 years, the Twisted the franchise finally continues the box office success of the 2024 disaster Twistednaturally inviting comparisons between the two films. Twisted is a sequel to the 1996 original, but makes very little mention of the original film outside of the storm tracking technology used and its naming conventions. Twisted is considered a reference film in special effects and received Oscar nominations for Best Visual Effects and Best Sound. This innovative film production helped make Twisted one of the highest-grossing films of the 1990s.
To truly compare the two films, they need to be viewed through an objective lens in relation to the massive time gap between their release dates. For example, Twisted Of course it had more impressive CGI than Twistedbut only because CGI has evolved a lot in the last 30 years. It’s best to look at the less technical elements of each film and compare them based on the merits of those elements. The end of Twisted echoes that of its predecessor, and there are enough common threads in the stories to ensure a truly fair comparison between the two films.
Twister vs. Twisters: which one has the best story
Both deal with state-of-the-art weather technology
In terms of history, Twisted essentially begins as a continuation of the mission established in Twisted. While Helen Hunt and Bill Paxton’s Jo and Bill Harding aim to collect never-before-seen data from inside a tornado to enable a better warning system, Daisy Edgar-Jones’ Kate Carter aims to use that same data to potentially stop a tornado. Both stories are also comparable because they feature a main character who has lost loved ones to tornadoes, although this leads Jo Harding into Twisted is a source of fear and hesitation for Kate Carter in Twisted.
Twisted also revitalizes the idea of ​​two competing storm chasing teams, pitting Tyler Owens’ experienced group of guerrilla storm chasers against Javier’s highly educated military-grade storm chasers. Twisted reflected this dynamic with the Hardings’ new homegrown science and technology versus Cary Elwes’s Jonas Miller and his corporate-funded team. Finally, both stories involve their main characters battling several deadly tornadoes before ultimately succeeding in their respective missions.; Jo manages to collect the data she was looking for and Kate manages to dismantle a tornado.
Although the stories are comparable, Twisted has the most complete and complete narrative. There are more fully realized characters in modern film, as Glen Powell’s Tyler Owens and Daisy Edgar-Jones’s Kate Carter simply have more depth than Helen Hunt’s Jo Harding and Bill Paxton’s Bill Harding. The twist (no pun intended) that Tyler Owens’ team has pure intentions while Javier’s Storm PAR team is working for a corrupt land baron provided an interesting change in the second half of the film and helped Tyler Owens and Kate Carter’s characters showing some real growth.
Twister vs. Twisters: which one has the best cast
The main stars of each film are household names
Helen Hunt may not have returned to Twistedbut its influence was still felt in the continued use of the Wizard of Oz-names related to the scientific equipment used by Kate and the Storm PAR team. Hunt was at the helm of a memorable cast that was part of the reason Twisted It was a huge box office success. It was a star turn for Hunt and Bill Paxtonand included several other renowned actors and actresses early in their careers, including Jami Gertz, Jeremy Davies, and future Oscar winner Phillip Seymour Hoffman.
Twisted also included some real A-listerseven if they didn’t have legendary status at the time of the film’s release in 1996. Cary Elwes was already an icon thanks to his leading roles in The princess bride and Robin Hood: men in tightsAlan Ruck became famous for playing Cameron in Ferris Bueller’s Day Offand Lois Smith had four decades of filmography at that time. In retrospect, it was a truly impressive cast that helped make the film a huge success.
Twisted Cast |
Twisted Characters |
Daisy Edgar-Jones |
Kate |
Glenn Powell |
Tyler |
Antonio Ramos |
Javi |
Brandon Perea |
Boone |
Maura Tierney |
Cathy |
Daryl McCormack |
Jeb |
Sasha Lane |
Lilly |
David Corenswet |
Scott |
Kiernan Shipka |
Addy |
Twisted it looks like it will have an eerily similar impact for its cast. Just like Helen Hunt and Bill Paxton were in 1996, Daisy Edgar-Jones and Glen Powell are about to become household names and Twisted could push them to the top. The supporting cast is also full of talented talent as Anthony Ramos, Brandon Perea, Sasha Lane, Katy O’Brian and David Corenswet. Time will tell if this cast will reach the heights of its predecessor, but for now Twisted has the superior cast.
Twister vs. Twisters: which one has the best action
Twister’s action and CGI hold up surprisingly well
The talented team behind Twister’s practical and special effects changed the game when it comes to disaster films. Thanks in part to a gigantic budget, they were able to put huge funnels and waterspouts, explosions and storm damage on screen that still hold up 28 years later. The storm chase sequences are thrilling and the tornadoes look truly dangerous as they tear across the screen.
However, Twisted can match the action of Twistedand take it to the next level. While it has the advantage of advances in CGI, the concepts of the double tornadoes, the huge fire tornado that forms over the oil refinery, and the tornado sequences that take place at the rodeo and in the small town at the end of the film are all superior to what was seen in Twisted. Simply put, Twisted took the best parts of the action in Twisted and made them better.
Why Twisters is better than Twister
It’s a more complete summer blockbuster
There’s no denying it Twisted is an iconic film of the disaster film genreand a milestone in the development of special effects in American cinema. It has aged particularly well and is still one of the greatest disaster films of all time. However, the 28-year difference between Twisted and Twisted gave director Lee Isaac Chung time to get every little detail right when it comes to elevating what made the first film so great.
Twisted is a tremendous indie disaster film that nails all the parts of what you’d expect from a big summer blockbuster.
Twisted includes a strong, engaging narrative anchored by an extremely talented cast of young actors (and Maura Tierney, who elevates practically everything she appears in). It features heart-stopping action sequences based on very strong modern CGI techniques. It has characters with real depth, who really grow and change throughout the film on their way to satisfying character arcs. Perhaps most importantly, honor the original Twisted without ever seeming like a simple remake; Twisted is a tremendous indie disaster film that nails all the parts of what you’d expect from a big summer blockbuster.
The argument for Twister being the best film
The legacy of the original cannot be ignored
Following in the footsteps of other modern sequels released decades after the original, such as Top Gun: Maverick, Twisted managed to surpass the 1996 Twisted in many ways. The effects were better, the story seemed more coherent and even the soundtrack for Twisted seemed more carefully selected and memorable (opting for plenty of bluegrass and country rather than the alternative rock themes that Twisted and dozens of other 90s films). However, while Twisted is seen by most viewers as an improvement, it is still far from difficult to argue that Twisted It’s the superior film.
Firstly, there is the obvious point that without Twisted, Twisted would not exist. It is due to the popularity of Twisted that the 2024 sequel was highly anticipated. Even with advanced CGI, there is every chance that Twisted It would have simply been dismissed as another disaster film if it weren’t for the fact that it was a sequel to the 1996 hit.
There have been many tornado movies since Twisted, like 2014 In the storm, 2011 Take shelter, and 2023 Supercell. While Twisted was a success, without a doubt it doesn’t do much that other tornado films don’t do. It can’t be said that its box office success was due to the special effects or the story, however impressive both were. He owed much to the legacy of Twisted, which exceeded all expectations when it was released in 1996. The reason so many moviegoers went to theaters wasn’t to see a new movie about tornadoes – it was because they specifically wanted to see the sequel to Fan.
Another reason Twisted can be seen as the best film is that it was most innovative for its time. The CGI in Twisted is stunning, and its tornado scenes are genuinely jaw-dropping, though they’re not necessarily groundbreaking either. The same is not true for Fan. Although technologically simpler, the tornado occurs at times Twisted It delivered something that 1996 audiences simply hadn’t seen before, and as a result, it deservedly received Oscar nominations for Best Sound and Best Visual Effects.
Twisted, as well as other films about tornadoes and disasters that followed, such as 2004’s The day after tomorrow or 2021 13 minutes, we all owe a lot to Fan. The 1996 original probably wrote the blueprint for how to best represent the thrill and danger of tornadoes effectively on the big screen. For innovation, Twisted beats Twisted easily, and it is almost impossible to argue otherwise. While Twisted can be seen as a superior viewing experience thanks to its modern sheen, it’s impossible to ignore that there’s still a long way to go to overcome the legacy of Fan.