This 11-year-old animated film is part of the Pixar Universe (but is not a Pixar movie).

Although 2013s Planes Considered part of the Pixar universe, it was not actually made by the studio. PlanesFollowing a crop duster whose dream is to compete in the Wings Around the Globe Race, is a spinoff of the popular Cars Franchise. After the success of Planes, Planes: Fire and Rescuewas released in 2014 as a sequel. It was supposed to be a third installment in the Planes franchise too, But it was canceled after the production studio behind the movie was closed.

Pixar has produced several movies for Disney, including the record-breaking Inside Out 2. The studio was behind developing the Cars franchise but did not produce the spinoff, PlanesDespite the movies being set in the same universe. Pixar could not have been behind the production of Planes, But there are several things in the feature film that connect it to Pixar Cars.

Planes are set in the same universe as Cars (but is not a Pixar movie)

Planes is produced by Disneyton Studios

Given the similarities between Cars And Planes, It is clear that the two movies are set in the same universe. Cars And Planes Have the same aesthetic, such as the eyes and movements of the characters. Another thing that puts the two animations in the same universe is their premise. in PlanesDusty wants to win the Wings Around the Globe race and enlists the help of Skipper to be his mentor. while in CarsLightning McQueen’s greatest ambition is to win the Piston Cup, a goal he seeks to achieve with the help of Doc, who becomes his mentor throughout the story.

According to the widely circulated Pixar theory, All Pixar movies exist in the same universe and can be watched in chronological order. In theory, the events in Cars Happen after Up When machines were left to populate the earth. While there are reasons why the Pixar theory doesn’t work, the fact that planes are machines also shows that Cars And Planes exist in the same universe. Next, there is a picture of McQueen on a newspaper in Planes This can lead to the conclusion that the two animations do indeed share a universe.

Planes’ Pixar connection explained

John Lasseter was behind the concept of planes

Despite Planes Not being a Pixar movie, it has several connections to the animation studio. John Lasseter, the former chief creative officer of Pixar and Walt Disney Animation Studios, was behind the concept of Planes. Lasseter, who directed Cars And Cars 2Served as an executive producer on Planes. Since Lasseter was behind Planes And Cars, It explains why the two movies have the same aesthetic.

Lasseter was also the chief creative officer of Disneyton Studios, the studio that developed Planes. Disneyton Studios was in charge of producing direct-to-video sequels to Disney feature films. The studio produced several feature films before it was closed, including Tinker Bell and the Legend of the Neverbeast, Cinderella III: A Twist in TimeAnd DuckTales the Movie: Treasure of the Lost Lamp. Planes was meant to be a direct-to-video animation, which explains why Pixar didn’t produce the movie. However, Disney later reversed the decision after seeing the potential of Planes And the animation was released in theaters instead. Planes was the first film released theatrically by Disneyton Studios since Pooh’s Heffalum Movie.

Why planes was nowhere near as successful as cars

Planes was not a success with critics

While Planes And Cars has the same creative mind behind them, FlatIt was not as successful as Cars. Planes had a budget of $50 million and earned $240.2 million at the box office. Carson the other hand, had a budget of $120 million and made $462 million at the box office. The fact that Planes wasn’t a Pixar movie was the film’s downfall. Planes not being developed by Pixar but by Disneyton Studios meant it had a smaller budget than Cars. pilots’ Lower production budget worked against it because it meant it didn’t have the same quality as Cars.

The budget of the feature film also meant that the animation was not as well marketed as Cars was, which contributed to why it was not as successful. Planes Received a lukewarm reception from critics, while Cars was more positive. Although Planes And Cars has a similar premise and main character, McQueen was funnier and more entertaining than Dusty. The fact that Planes Was not as successful as Cars Added to the reason why there hasn’t been a third installment in the franchise, however Cars Ended up with a third position, with a fourth Cars Movie remains a real possibility to boot.