The Lord of the Rings is Peter Jackson’s most iconic trilogy, but the second movie was only faithful to the book to a certain extent. Jackson made changes to Tolkien’s stories during his fame Lord of the Rings And Hobbit Trilogies, both of which are based on Tolkien’s books. All three Hobbit Movies are based on Tolkien’s 1937 novel, The HobbitWhile The Lord of the Rings Movies are based on the three parts of Tolkien’s magnum opus, The Lord of the Rings. Jackson’s second LotR movie was praised, but its diversions from the source material annoyed some fans.
The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers The movie differed from the book in many ways, retaining some of the book’s key pillars but dispensing with others. Fans were divided about the movie’s merits, but it stormed the box office upon its release in 2002 and remains one of the most successful fantasy movies ever released. Ultimately, many of Jackson’s changes were necessary to make Tolkien’s novel suitable for the screen. Some changes were much less necessary than others, but in the grander scheme of things, they contributed to a movie that captured the drama and wonder of Middle-earth.
10
Théoden was under a spell in the movie
Saruman’s grip on Théoden was different in the source material
Saruman helped Théoden under some dark spell The Lord of the Rings: The Two TowersBut his influence on Théoden was much more subtle in this book. As Tolkien wrote the character of Théoden, he was besieged by many concerns and obstacles, including the death of his son. In this sense, he was discouraged, initially, from fighting the orcs. Gríma Wormtongue, being Saruman’s tool, fueled Théoden’s lack of confidence with poor advice. Peter Jackson enhanced Saruman’s influence on Théoden for his movie, making Saruman’s toxic influence a literal spell.
Jackson gave Saruman’s spell the physical manifestation of Théoden’s grotesque premature aging. It was an incredible and striking feat of cinematic engineering, and Théoden’s recovery was one of the movie’s most redemptive moments. Theoden was a strong redemptive character, so Jackson got it right. It was a shame that he took away some of Théoden’s agency during his redemptive journey, but it was understandable that Jackson had to sacrifice some great content, keeping in mind “The Lord of the Rings” Wide runtimes.
9
Erkenbrand played a huge role in the book
Peter Jackson used Eomer instead of Erkenbrand
Erkenbrand was Lord of Dipping-com in The two towersPart two of Tolkien’s novel, but he did not appear in Peter Jackson’s film. Erkenbrand was a big part of Rohan’s strategy in The Lord of the Rings. moreover, Erkenbrand was instrumental to Rohan’s success In the war of the ring. Jackson’s decision to cut him from his movie ties into a more overarching change that Jackson made to the source material. Peter Jackson was struggling to narrow down scenes in all his movies, having to deal with a vast and sprawling story.
In the end, Jackson made extended editions of The Lord of the Rings movies to compensate for the content that he would have preferred to keep in the theatrical editions. One way Jackson was able to streamline content was by reducing the large range of characters that Tolkien presented to him. Erkenbrand was one of the Tolkien characters that Jackson sacrificedUse Karl Urban’s Éomer to fill the void. This allowed more focus on Éomer, making his arc more meaningful.
8
Jackson gave Gimli more comedy lines
Gimli was quite serious in this book
One of the biggest differences between The Lord of the Rings Book and movies must be Gimli’s character. Gimli was one of the oldest and wisest members of the Fellowship of the Ring in Tolkien’s novel. Jackson’s movies didn’t necessarily contradict this, but they used Gimli as comic relief. Gimli has some hilarious lines in The Lord of the Rings: The Two TowersMade for a controversial script.
Gimli’s request to Aragorn – “Don’t tell the eleven” About being tossed in the path of his enemies – refers back to one of the best Gimli quotes of the trilogy. Gimli had previously said that no one tossed a dwarf. Gimli may have lost some of his braveryBut he gets some of the best lines in the movie. In that sense, the screenplay by Peter Jackson, Philippa Boyens, Fran Walsh and Stephen Sinclair was a balancing act that paid off for many viewers but disappointed others.
7
Rohan’s citizens fled to Dunharrow in the novel
Théoden sent his men to Helms deep in the movie
Théoden innocently sent the citizens of Rohan to Helm’s Deep to weather the storm of the Battle of the Hornburg, but he has no such thing in the book. Tolkien’s Theoden The Lord of the Rings Roman sent his men to Dunharrow To protect from the attack of the orcs. Théoden was much more heroic in this book. Jackson’s decision to let Théoden send his men to Helm’s Deep made him look like a worse leader than he was in the book.
Théoden’s decision to go to Helm’s Deep with both army and citizens made it seem as if he was running away from battle, but the Théoden of the books was confrontational when it came to war.
Not only is Théoden’s decision foolish from a military perspective, but it also illustrates that he was unwilling to listen to Gandalf’s advice, which was not flattering to him. Théoden’s decision to go to Helm’s Deep with both army and citizens made it seem like he was running away from battle, but the Théoden of the books was confrontational when it came to war. Jackson allowed Théoden’s bravery to slip So that he would act as an obstacle to his focal heroes, Aragorn and Gandalf.
6
Faramir treats Frodo and Gollum better in this book
Faramir was more respectful in the novel
Faramir exhibited much better behavior when dealing with Frodo and Gollum in the book. In this movie, he showed a level of cruelty. Paramir was one part of The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers That constituted such a big change to lore That it pushed the boundaries of Jackson’s acceptability. Adaptations do not have to be completely faithful to work, but they should capture the spirit of the original.
Jackson’s Faramir movie was sometimes very far removed from the character Tolkien created, making Jackson’s lore breaks seem a little on the questionable side. however, Jackson managed to pull Faramir’s character back in the right direction. And, in the end, it might have been difficult to compress the timeline of the overall story without adjusting some ofFrodo’s interactions with Faramir.
5
The Ents need less convincing to fight in the novel
The Hobbits manipulated the Ents in the movie
Peter Jackson made several changes to the Ent’s storyline in his Two towers Movie. The hobbits are able to manipulate the Ents into going to war Against Saruman in The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers. Pippin, in particular, precipitated Isengard’s downfall by suggesting that the Ents go to Isengard. This allowed Treebeard and the Ents to see Saruman’s evil at work, convincing them to help the hobbits fight against him.
Peter Jackson will produce The Lord of the Rings: The Hunt for Gollum, Expected to come out in 2026.
However, in the novel, the Ents decide to do it themselves, without the Hobbits’ extra persuasion. As a result, the Ents were a slightly less friendly presence in the movie. Jackson’s change made the hobbits seem smarter. The Ents were one of Tolkien’s great fantasy racesHeroic and humane, but Jackson’s changes shifted some of allgo muchedlyizelyizelylyssssssfully[”)NeverthelesstheywereformidablealliesinJackson’sWaroftheRingmakingtheirpowerclear
4
Theoden’s most heroic moment was given to Aragorn
Aragorn took Théoden’s best lines
Théoden suggested riding out to meet the enemy during the Battle of the Hornburg in the book, but Aragorn stole the moment in the movie. In Tolkien’s novel, Théoden asked Aragorn to join him on the battlefield:”Will you ride with me then, son of Arathran? Maybe we will choose a way, or make such an end, which will be worthy of a song.“
It was the culmination of a long struggle on Théoden’s part and cemented some of the book’s best character development. Tolkien took Theoden from an antihero to a true hero. This made him more compelling than the characters who were heroes to begin with.
Jackson captured a small glimmer of that transition, but unfortunately, much of it was sacrificed to Jackson’s script. in The two towers, Jackson allowed Aragorn to shine When Théoden felt defeated, give him the immortal lines “Drive out and meet them… for Rohan. For your people.“Jackson only had limited screen time to create convincing characters. Unfortunately, spreading heroic moments among many, according to their canonical arcs, probably would have made them all a little less convincing. Focusing heroics on a select few targeted a greater impact.
3
Faramir opposes the ring more in the text
Faramir was one of the biggest heroes of the book
Faramir was easily one of the best characters in The Lord of the Rings And one of the greatest heroes, but this is not done The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers. Peter Jackson showed that Faramir was tempted by the One Ring In his movie, emphasizing his power over the race of people. This served to make the race of men more consistent and Aragorn more exceptional. It also served to demonstrate how impressive it was that Frodo and Sam both coped with the ring as they did.
Faramir was constantly overlooked by their father, while Boromir was loved. This made Paramir’s goodness and wisdom all the more.
However, it neglected Faramir’s purity and strength. In the source material, Faramir’s resistance to the Ring was impressive. Faramir was a stark contrast to his brother, Boromir. He was more worthy than his brother of a place in the fellowship of the ring, although he was the least favorite son. Faramir was constantly overlooked by their father, while Boromir was loved. This made Paramir’s kindness and wisdom all the more surprising.
2
The Two Towers ignores Saruman’s fate
Jackson originally intended to cut Saruman’s death from the trilogy
Saruman’s fate was very different The Lord of the Rings Novel and The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers Movie. Saruman died near the end of The Lord of the Rings Book, Killed by Gríma Wormtongue. Jackson chose to include a scene of Saruman’s death in The two towers, But later cut it to make time for other scenes. Many fans, plus Saruman actor Christopher Lee, deemed this a gross departure from Saruman’s character arc and petitioned Warner Bros. to change it.
Related
Therefore, Peter Jackson ended up including Saruman’s deleted death scene in the extended edition of The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King. In this version of Saruman’s death, he was killed by Wormtongue, as he was in the book. however, Saruman fell from the top of Orthanc and died impaled on some of his own machinery. In the movie, which was an invention of Jackson.
1
The movie reserves Shelob for its sequel
The hobbits met Shelob in the second part of the book
JRR Tolkien finished his second part of The Lord of the Rings By introducing the hobbits to Shelob, but the Warner Bros trilogy did not introduce Shelob until The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King. in this sense, The ending of the movie changed the core elements of its source material. This probably made sense, considering how long it was The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers Already been.
This change meant that The return of the king Was an excellent start and has a fresh slate, covering Schlob’s terrifying assault from the start. It also enabled Peter Jackson and his team to focus on the confrontation at Helm’s Deep as the climax of the movie. The change provided a logical denouement for a movie that focused on the terror of war, as befits The Lord of the Rings.