The Rings of Power Season 2 monster can explain a controversial Hobbit movie scene

The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power referenced The Hobbit With his monster and answered some of the questions posed by the Peter Jackson trilogy. The rings of power Season 2 is plowing through epic monsters, many drawn directly from the works of fantasy author JRR Tolkien — the show has the rights to adapt Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings And The Hobbit. Season 2, episode 4 debuted a mighty worm beast. This creature is certainly not as famous as Shelob, the Ents, or the Barrow joke, but it is a throwback to one scene in The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies.

Peter Jackson The Lord of the Rings And The Hobbit Trilogies showed the world Tolkien monsters like Ents and Shelob for the first time, and also snuck a lesser known monster on screens. The movies have the right to adapt the same material as the show. The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies Premiere a giant worm monster emerges from the earth like a sandworm from Don. This monster was a controversial addition to the movie, with close ties to Tolkien, however The rings of power Worm Monster seems to be the same creature and provides enlightening detail on it.

The Rings of Power provides a possible origin for the Hobbit’s worm monsters

Episode 4 explains the worm monsters

The worm monster in The rings of power Season 2 is identified as a “Name without thing” by Elf Arondir, suggesting that Jackson’s monster may have been one of these. Not much is known about nameless thingsBut Gandalf encountered several during his fight with the Balrog. in The Lord of the Rings book, Gandalf explains that “Far, far below the depths of the dwarves, is the world of the nameless. Not even Sauron knows them. They are older than him.“Attacking Isildur and pulling him into the mud, this name is defeated by Arondir.

This left the audience with a fresh visual interpretation of the beasts that roam the world. It makes sense for this worm beast to be a nameless thing, seeing as it tunnels underground like the creatures described by Gandalf. Although Rings of power Evidently putting his own spin on Gandalf’s “Name things,“The creature bears a strong resemblance to the worm in The Battle of the Five Armies. Gandalf called Jackson’s worm a “was-worm“In the movie, exhibiting questionable fidelity to the source material. Understanding the movie monster as a “Name without thing“Make it make a little more sense.

Why Peter Jackson’s were-worms are controversial in The Hobbit

Were-worms had a bigger role in the movie than in the book

To some, the inclusion of were-worms in an adaptation of The Hobbit Book was jarring. Jackson expanded the story from one children’s book into three adult moviesNecessitating the considerable changes to the canon of the story and many additions. The lucrative choice annoyed fans looking for a faithful adaptation of the classic Tolkien novel, and one change that caught flak was Azog’s use of were-worms in his dark army, which never happened in the book. However, were-worms were a part of Tolkien’s story. The Hobbit Protagonist, Bilbo Baggins, mentions them at one point.

Bilbo said “Tell me what you want done, and I’ll try it, if I have to go from here to the east of the east and fight the wild wereworms in the last desert.” Were-worms were nothing more than a hobbit folk tale And never appeared in the book outside of Bilbo’s one allusion to them. Jackson’s embellishment of The Hobbit The plot with were-worms was fun, although it was not well met by everyone. Rings of power Developed the movie monster Jackson began to build, making his role in the legendarium clearer and confirming the likelihood that it was a real monster that actually existed in Tolkien’s world, rather than a folk tale.

The Worm Beast is a fun expansion on Tolkien mythology

Tolkien wanted to create myths

Dialogue between adaptations within The Lord of the Rings Franchise honors the spirit of Tolkien’s work, which built layer upon layer of mystery, myth and truth. JRR Tolkien was ahead of his time In creating a meta book series that established each novel as a publication of letters in the story, developing an internal myth system. Bilbo wrote the story described in The Hobbit In his Red Book of Westmarsh. Tolkien used a biased perspective to distort the truth, creating a mythopeia – a mysterious set of fictional myths. The on-screen appearances of the mythical worm beast fit nicely into this mythopeia.

The Red Book of Westmarch was completed by Frodo and ends with the story of The Lord of the Rings. Likewise, many of the stories, essays, and poems that Tolkien wrote about Middle-earth were confirmed by Tolkien to have been written by Elvish scribes or minstrels. Tolkien presented his stories as biased to a certain extentAllowing the option of​​​​alternative versions of the truth to be possible. This allowed Jackson to play with the idea of ​​Bilbo’s folk tale as real. In turn, it allowed Rings of power To play with Jackson’s creature as a precursor to his own worm monster.

After Tolkien died, his son released The Silmarillion Before publishing alternative versions of the published stories in The Lord of the Rings World. This showed the development of the story and explained the editorial choices The Silmarillion. Inconsistencies revealed many alternative and supplementary stories to be as relevant as The Silmarillion. Magically, it all served to create an even wider myth. If adaptations can reflect this framework, more power to them. Whether worm, name, or both, the monster in The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power Season 2 fits into a mythical Tolkien tradition.