The biggest difference between White collar and Suits That’s why, despite their equal levels of popularity, one is being revived while the other is getting a spinoff series. White collar and Suits share many similarities, including their recent rise in popularity on Netflixwhich now results in his return to the network television sphere. However, each of your returns will take a different form, depending on White collar is receiving a complete renaissance while Suits: LA is confirmed as a spinoff.
While updates to White collar revivals have been scarce, it’s very clear that the plot will follow the characters from the original series. Meanwhile, the Suits spinoff will follow a new set of characters with only the possibility of cameos from the original cast. This distinction may seem confusing, as both shows featured similar procedural structures and dynamics between the characters. That said, a fundamental difference between the basic programs easily explains this decision: White collar was about Neal Caffrey (Matt Bomer) and his journey, while Suits focused on the stories of the Pearson Hardman team.
White Collar was about Neal, Suits was about a cast
Neal was the central point of the narrative, Harvey and Mike were not
Neal’s character growth and arc was the main story of White collar, which contrasted with It suits’ focus of the set. All over White collarIn the original season, the story was driven largely by Neal’s development as aspects of his past and present choices played out. Many of White collarMichael’s cases reflected his own inner turmoil or changing views, like Season 2’s “Countermeasures”, and used these beats to highlight the show’s main themes. of change and redemption. Neal’s relationship with Peter Burke (Tim DeKay) was even adapted into his arc, as their growing friendship inspired him to reflect and triggered parts of his metamorphosis.
If it suits, on the other hand, it had a broad focus on the ensemble, giving each of the character arcs moments to shine and drive the plot forward. Harvey Specter (Gabriel Machet) and Mike Ross (Patrick J. Adas) may have been the main anchor points and arcs that got the most attention, but characters like Jessica Pearson (Gina Torres) and Rachel Zane (Megan Markle) drove episodes on their own through their actions. As a result, a renaissance for White collar works because it can’t go on without Neal while Suits I can tell a story without Harvey and Mike.
White Collar Without Neal Wouldn’t Work, But Suits Was More Than Mike and Harvey
Later seasons of Suits proved its status as an ensemble show
Mike’s departure from Suits in Season 7 showed that the series was more than its story and dynamic with Harvey, a strategy that White collar I couldn’t use it because the series couldn’t exist without Neal. Mike’s story ended naturally after season 7but Suits continued without him. Suits seasons 8 and 9 were able to give the other characters even more screen time and allow new characters to arrive Suits without breaking the story. This would not be an option for White collar as its focus was exclusively on Neal’s character development.
White collaron the other hand, it would feel empty without Neal, as much of the story is built around him, making it Suits the best option for a spinoff that explores the world outside of the original characters.
ONE Suits So the spinoff is better than a revival because it can continue to explore the ensemble dynamics of those later seasons as it follows other lawyers from a different firm. Even with new characters, Suits would still retain its heart as long as the same crisp dialogue and story writing were appliedand the focus is on the entire cast of a character. White collar, on the other hand, it would feel empty without Neal, as much of the story is built around him, making it Suits the best option for a spinoff that explores the world outside of the original characters.