The original Netflix docuseries Ancient Apocalypse Just released its second season, titled Ancient Apocalypse – The Americas. how was Ancient Apocalypse season 1, Ancient Apocalypse – The Americas is hosted by journalist Graham Hancock. Although Ancient Apocalypse Season 1 has gained some popularity among Netflix documentaries on the paranormal, the show has also received widespread criticism. Among the issues that were brought about Ancient Apocalypse In season 1, critics voiced the most concerns about Hancock’s ‘pseudoarchaeal theories’, suggesting that Hancock’s claims were unfounded.
Despite the controversy, Netflix pushed forward with season 2, and the show shockingly incorporated beloved actor and star of the John Wick Kino Kino also thrives in the new season, albeit only minimally. As in the first season, in Ancient Apocalypse – The Americas, Hancock argues that there was an advanced human civilization that flourished during the Ice Age.. in The AmericaHancock specifically uses the fossilized human footprints at White Sands, New Mexico, to further defend his theory.
In 2009, fossilized human footprints were discovered in White Sands, New MexicoIn a dry lake bed. This was an incredible discovery, because, previously, many scientists believed that people had only been in the area now known as North America for 16,000 years or less. The footprints meant a major update to the theory, however, with the estimate now being closer to 23,000 years ago, at least based on the carbon dating in relation to the footprints.
It is worth noting that even this estimate has become controversial, however. Because the carbon dating process involved seeds, which may have taken in older carbon from water, some scientists remain skeptical about the accuracy of the dates provided. Human footprints were also found along the track of what appeared to be a massive earth slot, which has interesting implications about human interactions with creatures at the time.
Related
As mentioned, the age of the White Sands footprints was established by carbon dating. The prints themselves are unable to be carbon dated, though. Rather, grass seeds were found around the prints, and these were analyzed by radiocarbon dating.
Through this process, it was revealed that The seeds were between 21,000 and 23,000 years old. Based on this, the track itself was also estimated to be around 23,000 years old, although, as mentioned, there are a number of considerations when it comes to this conclusion. For one, the dates represent the results of the carbon dating done on the seeds, not the footprints themselves (as this is not possible because they lack organic material).
It is quite possible that the tracks themselves are not 23,000 years old.
The aforementioned concern about the ability of the seeds to take up groundwater with older carbon also raises questions in this case. Given this, it is quite possible that the tracks themselves are not 23,000 years old, and there is a lot of debate on the subject. Even so, it was a remarkable discovery that opened up a number of conversations about when humans might have first appeared in the area. If these numbers are accurate, they would represent a truly revolutionary update to the timeline.
in Ancient Apocalypse – The AmericasGraham Hancock claims that the existence of the footprints, which may be 23,000 years old, supports his claims about an advanced civilization of humans during this period. His argument seems to largely stem from the idea that much has yet to be learned about the humans of this era. He also believes that, based on the relatively recent discovery of the tracks, it is plausible that the time and manner in which people arrived in the North American region needs further examination.
Hancock is also of the belief that the 23,000 year estimate may just be the beginning. In his opinion, it is possible that people have been around for a little longer, and the White Sands footprints only got the ball rolling by revealing that previous perceptions about the earliest human presence in the North American region were wrong. It is important to note, this is part of what has made Hancock’s view so controversial even among other documentaries on the unexplained.
Given how much skepticism there is already surrounding the 23,000-year-old date for the White Sands footprints, it makes sense that many would oppose the idea that humans were in the North American region long before that. Hancock’s position that such people are part of an advanced civilization is a much harder sell even than this. While the White Sands footprints are actually fossilized human footprints found in North America that seem to predate the age previously thought possible, Graham Hancock’s theories about this revelation in Ancient Apocalypse – The Americas Stay controversial.