The long delay and doubt about the production and release of Star Trek 4 is a direct result of the biggest change in JJ Abrams’ reboot movies. Since 2016’s premiere of Star Trek: BeyondFans have been waiting for the release of its elusive sequel. After bouncing around different directors and writers, star trek 4′His future is still unknown. With many reasons why the film was delayed, it’s easy to wonder why the success of JJ Abrams’ first three reboot films, Star Trek (2009), Star Trek Into DarknessAnd Star Trek NextIs not enough to ensure the production of another movie.
Since Star Trek: The Motion Pictureeach Star Trek Movie relied on existing TV series to get movie-worthy casts and stories. Star Trek: The Original Series Cast produced 6 films, and Star Trek: The Next Generation Continued his stories with 4 TNG Movies. Except for the unexplored youth of Beloved Star Trek Characters, JJ Abrams’ Kelvin timeline started from scratch. This kind of obstacle, along with the struggle of scheduling top-billed movie stars, may be one of the reasons it was so difficult to produce. Star Trek 4.
Star Trek 2009’s ambitious movie schedule is partly responsible for Star Trek 4’s delay
With no TV series to back it up, Kelvin’s timeline is on its own
If JJ Abrams thought for a reboot Star Trek It was started as a TV series in 2009, it may be easier to make more films. The main benefit of a TV series, especially shows that run for multiple seasons like Star Trek Shows usually do, is that Audiences get to know the characters, story development and setting in a much deeper way. Instead of starting with a 2-hour film, Star Trek TV shows often have 5+ seasons of material. Creating a film series based on recognizable material and well-known characters makes the process faster because popularity is already established.
Related
Star Trek (2009), the first film in the reboot franchise, does not have this advantage. Chris Pine’s Captain James T. Kirk commanded a Starship Enterprise crew that was familiar in name but not visually recognizable. Audience did not have a few or more seasons with them before the release of the movie. nevertheless, Star Trek (2009) was a success and remains the top-grossing Star Trek Film. However, JJ Abrams Star Trek Sequels soon found it Harder to create original, movie-worthy stories. Star Trek Into Darkness Essentially remaking Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan is proof. finally, Star TrekKelvin’s timeline was a novelty that did not have the same pull as the previous one Star Trek Movies based on popular TV series.
Other reasons behind the long development of Star Trek 4 and constant setbacks
Box office numbers and an increased streaming presence of Star Trek are also to blame
JJ Abrams’ cast is a good one – with Chris Pine as Captain Kirk, Zachary Quinto as Spock, and Zoe Saldana as Lt. Nyota Uhura – but they don’t have as much support as a TV show-turned-movie. Letters. To make matters more complicated, the actors and others who were in the first three Kelvin timeline Star Trek Films are now even bigger – and busier – Hollywood stars, so meIt is challenging to plan an extended movie shoot with them all at once. Factor in Star Treks growing streaming presence, and it’s easy to see where the franchise’s efforts are still headed Star Trek Next.
Related
There are many exciting upcoming Star Trek projects, and most of them will premiere on streaming platforms, mainly Paramount +. The popularity of Star Trek: DiscoveryThe story of Section 31 earned Michelle Yeoh’s Empress Philippa Georgiou her own TV movie, further proving the success of a TV show-to-movie pipeline. JJ Abrams Star Trek Movies are mostly successful, however Star Trek Next‘s diminishing box office returns are a significant factor of star trek 4′s almost decade-long development hell. You can’t help yourself if Star Trek 4‘s development would have sped up if the reboot films had the benefit of a successful, long-running TV show to back them up.