Leonardo DiCaprio’s Oscar-winning hit $533 million was a stealth remake of a western that was released 44 years earlier

22 years after his first Academy Award nomination in 1994, Leonardo DiCaprio ended his Oscar drought with his role as Hugh Glass in The Revenant. DiCaprio gave other Oscar-worthy performances, but he was always up against stiff competition and never managed to win the prize. In survival movie The RevenantThe hardships he went through while bringing the true story to life almost certainly helped him win the Oscar, with reports from The Revenant Acknowledging the physical endurance it took to play his part.

Filming The Revenant Production took drastically over its initial $60 million budgetAs director Alejandro G. Iñárritu wanted to shoot the movie both in sequence and in natural light, and with The Revenants filming locations being so remote, the cast and crew traveled for most of each day to get there, leaving fewer hours for filming. This exploration of difficult terrain was in the spirit of the Western movie genre, which The Revenant was compared to, and an even closer comparison might be to a western released in 1971, and for a fraction of The Revenants budget.

The Revenant is basically the same story as 1971’s Man in the Desert

Both survival movies are based on the same true story

Both The Revenant And Man in the desert Tell the story of a fur trapper who was mauled by a bear And left for dead by his team. He survives and begins a revenge mission through the desert. Although Man in the desertWhich stars Richard Harris (better known now as Dumbledore in the first two Harry Potter movies), contains a religious storyline with the main character, Zachary Bass, struggling with his faith, and the two movies end differently, with The RevenantLet alone Hugh Glass’s ending, both are based on the same true story.

The true story that inspired The Revenant And Man in the Wilderness is the fur trapper Hugh Glass, who Man in the desert Renamed Zachary Bass. Glass was indeed attacked by a bear and abandoned by the people he was traveling with, although it took him two months to recover from his injuries, while both movies imply that his recovery took much less time. Glass ventured through the desert, but he was on a mission to get his beloved gun backRather than to avenge his son’s death, which is a central point in The Revenant.

The Revenant sticks closer to the true story of Hugh Glass

The Revenant’s graphic bear attack scene is accurate

Man in the desert is a product of its time, including outdated depictions of Native American characters, and a religious angle that the real-life Glass did not mention, however, Man in the desert It does not give the impression that it was intended to be a faithful recount. The Revenant Considered many names the sameAnd the battle scene at the beginning really happened. Although there is no evidence that Glass had a son or a Pawnee wife and little is known about what happened to Hugh Glass after the bear attack, the scene is confirmed to be frighteningly realistic.

The RevenantThe bear attack scene was praised for its disturbingly accurate depiction, although it was filmed using a combination of ​​a stuntman in a bear suit and CGI, unlike any other. Man in the desertwho used a real bear and a cheek. Iñárritu watched footage of over 100 bear attacks to ensure The Revenant Looked as real as possibleAnd while in Man in the desertThe bears are already attacking over food The RevenantGlass accidentally got between a mother bear and her cubs, which is more likely to trigger an attack.

The Revenant is a better movie, but The Man in the Desert is still worth watching

The R rating of Revenant was necessary for its success

Both The Revenant And Man in the desert are good moviesBut in The RevenantDiCaprio’s talent for playing historical figures and commitment to the role take center stage, and it’s hard now to separate the movie from its filming backstory. DiCaprio told The Hollywood Reporter. “I can name 30 or 40 sequences that were some of the most difficult things I’ve had to do.“Though not historically accurate, this visceral revenge story is the better movie. The Revenant is both beautifully shot and brutal. yet, Man in the desert is a compelling survival story in its own right.

Man in the desert has a PG rating, which makes sense for a movie that showcases the beauty of the desert and respect for the natural world, while It is hard to imagine The Revenant Without her blood, guts and needLike the scene in which Glasser has to sleep inside a horse for warmth. Many survival movies can work with a lower rating by implying the more painful parts of surviving, however, part of what makes The Revenant So deep is the combination of violence and beauty, and to achieve that degree that it was without an R rating would not have been feasible.

Source: The Hollywood Reporter