I’m so relieved The Walking Dead spinoffs have broken an annoying habit of the main show

0
I’m so relieved The Walking Dead spinoffs have broken an annoying habit of the main show

The Walking Dead was one of the best shows on television during its peak, but despite all its key strengths, it also had some major flaws, with one bad habit ultimately redeemed by its spinoffs. The zombie series first hit screens in 2010 and although it has had a rollercoaster journey since then, the IP still remains popular among its dedicated audience. Given that the franchise spanned 14 years, I’m not surprised that the series introduced a plethora of iconic characters along the way, some of which were part of The Walking Deads most haunting deaths.

The memorable survivors, along with the exciting story of the show, helped make The Walking Dead One of the most identifiable TV franchises of all time, but it’s also hard to ignore its flaws. Drawn out arcs, repetitive storylines, controversial deaths and unwanted cliffhangers all hurt the series’ legacyleading to a declining viewership over time The Walking Dead Season 11’s finale came around. Despite all these problems, one annoying habit proved to be constant throughout the show’s existence, but I’m relieved that the modern spinoffs have finally abandoned the trend after years of unnecessary frustration.

The Walking Dead spinoffs include a lot more swearing than the original show

The spinoff shows aren’t afraid to hold back when it comes to curse words

Although the original walking dead The show still contained some swearing, it was much less frequent than the newer spinoffs. Despite the graphic nature of the show, there seemed to be limitations to the volume of curse words in the earlier seasons.Which slowly began to loosen up to its last few installments. Thankfully, this allowed the spinoffs to be much more relaxed when it came to swearing, adding a more natural feel to the modern projects. In a world full of brutality and death, casual swearing feels very normal, which makes the lack of restrictions of the spinoffs extremely beneficial.

Dead City, Those who liveAnd Daryl Dixon All feature more colorful language, with Daryl Dixon Season 2 feels especially liberal when it comes to letting its characters swear.

Dead City, Those who liveAnd Daryl Dixon All feature more colorful language, with Daryl Dixon Season 2 feels particularly liberal when it comes to letting its survivors swear. Hearing walking dead Characters dropping F-bombs after years of being censored and restricted is oddly satisfying, and I’m glad the spinoffs aren’t holding back in that regard. The increased use of curse words doesn’t just feel like simple shock value or an attempt to be different; Instead, it makes the dialogue more dramatic and natural, giving the spinoffs a strong identity that was missing from the original series.

The Walking Dead’s lack of F-bombs became a problem

The Walking Dead ruined some great moments by censoring the show’s F-bombs

Many shows do well without F-bombs and an abundance of swearing, but while The Walking DeadCensorship didn’t break the show, it hurt it somewhat. The mature rating of the zombie series meant it was able to feature a lot of graphic content, which added weight to how deadly and brutal the franchise’s apocalyptic world is. However, the lack of swearing in this universe not only felt out of place, but it ruined some potentially great moments. Next, one of my favorite Rick Grimes walking dead Moments is relegated to a deleted scene, where he drops a hilarious F-bomb.

Related

The comedic moment showed how well casual swearing would have fit in the show, but the scene was replaced by a clean version. The same thing happened during the season 4 finale, where a grizzly statement from Rick with an F-bomb was censored with another word, reducing the impact of a terrifying speech. Even Negan – who is one of the most foul-mouthed characters in the comics – was restricted when it came to his use of swear words, as an uncensored version of his debut monologue featured 23 F-bombs, compared to the Clean version that came out. on television.

Considering The Walking Dead Featuring countless disturbing and gory scenes, the decision to limit the show’s language for so long ultimately became a problem, which was only amplified by the DVDs revealing the uncensored version of the scenes. While I can understand TV networks wanting to have certain limitations, some of The Walking DeadThe more brutal moments are far worse than any potentially offensive language would have beenAnd I’m still devastated the series isn’t bold with its swearing.

Swearing isn’t funny or smart, but the walking dead need it

The brutal story of The Walking Dead benefits from more casual swearing


Danai Gurira as Michonne and Andrew Lincoln as Rick Grimes in CRM uniforms flanked by Norman Reedus as Daryl Dixon in The Walking Dead
Custom image by Yeider Chacon

Although swearing is not strictly funny or clever, cursing can add humor and emotion to dialogue, and The Walking Dead Need this. Although the franchise can be a little wild at times, it is supposed to be grounded in reality and depict a version of ​​the real world if a zombie apocalypse breaks out. As a result, casual swearing feels appropriate for this type of show. The colorful language can help portray how stressed a character is, the shock they are feeling, or be used for comedic effect, as seen at times in the main show and the spinoffs.

Even if it takes a bit of suspension of belief to buy the idea of ​​zombies, Realism is an important element of the show, which makes the more natural reactions crucial. I don’t think so The Walking Dead has always been guilty of overly bad dialogue, but recent spinoffs are so much better when it comes to character interactions, and the simple use of swearing has helped with that. As a result, I hope the franchise continues to have fewer restrictions on language going forward, as curse words are a subtle but pivotal part of The Walking Dead.

Leave A Reply