How a lot Marlon Brando was paid by the godfather

When it was launched in 1972, The godfather cemented Marlon Brando's place amongst Hollywood's biggest actors of all time. His function as Vito Corleone earned him a brand new era of followers, in addition to an Oscar for Greatest Main Actor. His Oscar win got here even if his function was smaller than Al Pacino's function as Michael Corleone, though the Academy nominated Pacino for Greatest Supporting Actor. Brando was additionally paid about seven occasions greater than Pacino for his efficiency within the movie.

Because the movie's launch, rumors have proliferated about how a lot every actor was paid for his or her function in The godfather. Mockingly, on condition that Vito Corleone was the function that earned Brando his untouchable standing as a cinematic nice, your wage to The godfather It was a lot smaller than he anticipated for cinematographic works. The truth is, the quantity he acquired was an element that made him really feel mistreated by Paramount Studios through the movie's manufacturing. This uneasiness led him to desert a scene in its sequel, The Godfather Half IIon the day it was speculated to be filmed.

Marlon Brando acquired a decrease charge than regular for the most effective man

He was used to seven-figure salaries within the early Nineteen Seventies

Nevertheless, Brando's charges for The godfather it was not a small quantity. Though Pacino was solely paid $35,000 for the function that formed the remainder of his profession, Brando left with $250,000 up entrance for his efficiency because the titular character (by way of Smithsonian Magazine). Nonetheless, he wasn't the movie's highest-paid star.

Surprisingly, Richard S. Castellano was paid extra for his supporting function as Peter Clemenza than Brando was for taking part in Corleone. Moreover, Castellano refused to return as Clemenza within the second Godfather movie, as he needed much more cash than he made within the first one. There are rumors that Robert Duvall, who performed Tom Hagen within the first two Godfather movies, requested for a better wage than Brando as nicely, and the studio submitted to his demand.

Within the early Nineteen Seventies, Brando was used to incomes a number of occasions what Paramount initially paid him for his work in The godfather. His pre-box workplace earnings for the 1962 historic epic Riot on the Bountyfor instance, it was US$1.25 million (by way of Biography). Brando's excessive appearing charges have been one of many most important causes studio executives have been reluctant to forged him as Vito Corleone, in addition to his repute as considered one of Hollywood's unhealthy boys alongside Jack Nicholson and Warren Beatty. After director Francis Ford Coppola confirmed them Brando's shocking display screen take a look at as Corleone, that they had little alternative.

Marlon Brando's Godfather deal additionally included a web participation deal

He acquired a share of the movie's gross revenue

Then again, Marlon Brando couldn't really feel too unhealthy as soon as The godfather was launched in theaters. The studio made a proposal they couldn't refuse. Along with his base wage, his contract obligated him the one actor within the movie entitled to a share of its gross earnings on the field workplace, as reported in New York Times on the time it was launched. Because the movie was an enormous success, grossing round $160 million through the actor's lifetime, he ended up incomes $1.6 million on the field workplace along with his wage.

Brando's whole revenue of The godfather it price slightly below $2 million, a substantial sum for any actor of his period. Nevertheless, he quickly eclipsed that quantity, incomes a powerful $3.7 million for his supporting function as Jor-El within the 1978 movie. Superman. Brando's file wage was 10 occasions what Henry Cavill earned taking part in the Man of Metal himself greater than 30 years later, and it got here largely because of his earlier on-screen look as Vito Corleone. He might not have acquired the most important wage for his most celebrated function, however the cash it not directly earned him greater than made up for his preliminary appearing charge.

Sources: Biography, Smithsonian Magazine, New York Times