Harry Potter remake set to tackle unbreakable voting issue, 19 years after Half-Blood Prince introduced it

0
Harry Potter remake set to tackle unbreakable voting issue, 19 years after Half-Blood Prince introduced it

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood PrinceThe Unbreakable Vow storyline brought more questions than answers and, 19 years later, that now falls to the Harry Potter Television remake. Severus Snape made the Unbreakable Vow to Narcissa Malfoy at the suggestion of Bellatrix Lestrange. The aim was to ensure that he would do nothing against Draco's best interests and that he would kill Albus Dumbledore if the boy failed. It was the first time such a magical vote was mentioned in the Harry Potter series, which is strange as it certainly would have been useful before.

As the name suggests, Unbreakable Vows cannot be broken Harry Potter–or, at least, not without intense consequences. The person who does not fulfill his part of the agreement is doomed to deathwhich is why an Unbreakable Vow was the perfect solution for Bellatrix. She suspected that Snape was not truly loyal to Voldemort and would therefore pretend to protect Narcissa's son, only to turn against him in the end. What Bellatrix didn't know was that Snape had already promised Dumbledore that he would kill him instead of Draco, so the risk of the vote was reduced. Still, there are some problems here.

Harry Potter Remake Should Address Why Wizards Don't Use Unbreakable Vows More Often

Unbreakable Vows were only added to the mix in Book 5


Magical lines of gold surround Snape and Narcissa's intertwined hands to indicate an unbreakable vow in Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

Snape's Unbreakable Vow was the only time this unique curse was used in Harry Potter series, and that seems quite strange. The magic of the wizarding world makes deception much easier than in the Muggle world. So it seems like the characters would take every opportunity to make sure a person's word wasn't broken. Of course, death is a rather extreme consequence, and the Unbreakable Vow would certainly be considered Black Magic. So it makes some sense that Dumbledore or the Order of the Phoenix wouldn't utilize such power – but why not Voldemort?

The Unbreakable Vow Could Have Come in Useful Before Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

Lord Voldemort condemned himself by not using the unbreakable vow

Voldemort's downfall occurred, in part, because people he thought were loyal to him betrayed him. Snape was a double agent from the moment the Dark Lord turned his attention to Lily Potter, but Voldemort foolishly continued to trust him. Snape even mentioned during his conversation with Bellatrix and Narcissa that Voldemort questioned his loyalty after Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. He managed to convince the Dark Lord that he was still on his side, claiming that he had remained at Hogwarts out of faith that Voldemort would return and would need his information. That was, strangely enough, enough for the Dark Lord.

It's strange that Bellatrix was the first to consider making Snape use the Unbreakable Vow. Certainly, Voldemort would have used such dark magic the moment Snape appeared before him only after his resurrection in the cemetery (rather than responding to the Dark Lord's initial summons). The villain would also have been wise to have all of his Death Eaters swear the Unbreakable Vow the moment they entered his service to ensure they never made any attempt to betray him. For some reason or another, Voldemort never bothered, and it cost him dearly. Harry Potter.

Fixing this Harry Potter plot hole creates other problems for the HBO TV show

HBO will have to handle this carefully


Bellatrix takes the Unbreakable Vow on Snape and Narcissa in Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

HBO Harry Potter The TV remake has a chance to fix the Unbreakable Vow plot hole – but it won't be easy. If the new series shows Voldemort forcing his Death Eaters to take the Unbreakable Vow to join his inner circle, then Snape's entire story would become redundant. Perhaps the easiest solution would be to reveal that breaking an Unbreakable Vow does not lead to immediate death. It could work more like life debts in Harry Potterwhich will eventually result in the death of a person as fate sees fit. Still, this would somewhat lessen the impact of Snape's vote on Half-Blood Prince.

The HBO series has boasted of being “true to the book,” which means that even attempts to improve continuity can be a problem.

Anyway the Harry Potter The TV show could resolve the Unbreakable Vow issue and would require some changes to the canon story, and that typically doesn't go over well with longtime fans. The HBO series boasted as “faithful book”, which means that even attempts to improve continuity can be a problem. Harry Potter the remake would have to find a solution that fits neatly into the established canon but fills in the 19-year gaps left by the books. It remains to be seen whether he will be able to manage this successfully.

Leave A Reply