Happy Gilmore 2 Will Be Very Different From Adam Sandler’s First Movie (And That’s A Good Thing)

Happy Gilmore 2 is shaping up to be a very different movie than the classic original – and that’s a good thing, because it means it won’t just be a rehash of the first. Nearly three decades after the original film was released in 1996, Adam Sandler returned to his iconic role as a rage-filled golfer for a sequel to Happy Gilmore. The sequel has been set up at Netflix, with Sandler reprising his role as Happy, Christopher McDonald reprising his role as Shooter McGavin, and Julie Bowen reprising her role as Virginia Venit.

They will be joined by newcomers Benny Safdie, Nick Swardson and Bad Bunny, and Travis Kelce is set to make a cameo appearance. Kyle Newacheck, who previously directed Sandler in 2019 Murder mysteryis on board to helm the sequel. Sandler co-wrote the script with his original co-writer Tim Herlihy and production continues Happy Gilmore 2 is now under way. As the sequel is starting to take shape, It becomes clear that Happy Gilmore 2 will be a very different movie than its predecessor – and that’s a promising signBecause the worst sequels are afraid to try new things.

Happy Gilmore 2 doesn’t repeat the underdog story of the first movie

It doesn’t make sense for Glad to be the underdog again

Like many great sports movies, Happy Gilmore is a classic sports underdog tale. Happy is a wannabe hockey player who consistently gets rejected at every tryout. When he finds that his passionate approach to hockey transfers to golf, he enters a golf tournament in a bid to win enough money to buy back his grandmother’s foreclosed home. It has all the makings of a quintessential underdog story: a bid for a sports championship against the odds, a player seemingly outmatched by most of his peers, and a high-stakes cause to win the gold.

But Given Happy’s success at the end of the first movie, it wouldn’t make much sense for him to be the underdog again In the sequel. in Rocky WRocky Balboa may continue to be the underdog, as he did not win his fight against Apollo Creed in the first film. Once Rocky became a successful boxer, the franchise let go of his underdog story and instead focused on Rocky grappling with the foibles of fame. The Happy Gilmore Sequel needs to do something similar. Since Happy can’t be the underdog anymore, The sequel needs to find its conflict elsewhere.

Adam Sandler should give a different performance in Happy Gilmore 2

Mazal changed a lot throughout the first movie

Although Happy Gilmore 2 Sandler can’t just repeat his performance from the first movie. He is hilarious in Happy GilmoreJuxtaposing the white-hot rage of the hockey rink with the classy decorum of the golf course, but the character changed a lot throughout the film. As the first movie goes on, Lucky mellows down a bit and learns to control his anger A little more. After falling in love and taking the golf tournament seriously, Happy begins to mature and cool off.

Anger is one of Sandler’s go-to areas for comedy, and he’s great at playing temper tantrums for laughs, but Almost 30 years later, is this really who the character should be? Happy Gilmore 2 Should probably keep some of Happy’s rage and include a couple of his signature tantrums so it still feels like the same character. But overall, Sandler’s portrayal of Happy should be a little more nuanced in the sequel. Sandler has grown a lot as an actor in those three decades, so he can pull off a more multidimensional performance than Happy.

Happy Gilmore 2 is very different for Adam Sandler’s sequel

Happy Gilmore 2 needs to be more than just a rehash of the original

Happy Gilmore No need for a sequel, as long as Sandler and co. make one It has to be more than just play-the-heat nostalgia bait. Sandler doesn’t do many sequels; Outside of Big apps 2, Murder mystery 2And a couple of Hotel Transylvania Sequels, he has left most of his films alone. None of the movies he’s made sequels to in the past have been considered one of his all-time classics like Happy Gilmore Is.

So, for Sandler to risk ruining one of his best movies by making a sequel, he needs a much better reason than just relying on audience nostalgia. If Happy Gilmore 2 Just revisit the original, and it will be another underwhelming legacy sequel, tarnishing the reputation of a beloved classic. Happy Gilmore 2 Needs its own identity separate from its predecessor.