Most fans agree that Dragon Ball Super is a worthy successor to Dragon Ball pEven if it’s not perfect. It is certainly better looked at Dragon Ball GTThe original successor series to pWhich has a rather poor reputation among fans. however, GTIts existence is still considered canon by the makers of Dragon Ball At Toei, and this causes some major issues when trying to squeeze Dragon Ball Super in the timeline.
Dragon Ball Super is ostensibly set in between the end of the Majin Buu saga of Dragon Ball p and the flash-forward to ten years in the future that is the epilogue of the series. A ten-year window seems like it would provide plenty of room to avoid continuity issues, but how Dragon Ball Super continued, it crept closer and closer to that time frame, with Dragon Ball Super: Super Hero Supposedly set just one year before the epilogue of Dragon Ball p. with Super Still continuing, it represents a major issue in regards to continuity, and it is difficult to reconcile.
Dragon Ball Super often contradicts Z and GT
Super’s Story Advancement outright contradicts older series
Dragon Ball Super has seen Goku and Vegeta gain new levels of power that would have been almost unimaginable in the Dragon Ball p Days, fighting on the level of gods and training under an angel and the god of destruction himself, Beerus. Needless to say, none of this is reflected in GTwhich is apparently placed Super Although it was created earlier. Fans revisiting GT Now often have to ask yourself, “Why isn’t Goku or Vegeta using Ultra Instinct/Super Saiyan Blue/etc to solve this problem?” And the series really doesn’t offer much of a solution.
As the last addition, it is up to Super To make sure that it fits into the previous continuity, and that includes the series that follows it as much as the one that preceded it. But the problems go further than just the absence of the new forms introduced in Super of GT. Vegeta’s character, for example, has developed quite a lot over the course of Dragon Ball SuperBut that character growth is not reflected in GT Generally, as he is exactly the same as he is at the end of Dragon Ball p.
Related
If the problems are only with Dragon Ball GTWhich can easily be dealt with by explaining GT Non-canonical, which many fans already consider to be the case anyway. however, Super is inconsistent with the epilogue of Dragon Ball p Or; Of course, Bulma says in the last chapter of the manga that they haven’t seen Goku in five years, something that is clearly not true in Super. Vegeta also acts as if he has not seen Goku in ages, when the fact, according to super, Is that they have been training together for years now.
Dragon Ball Super is running out of time to resolve the conflicts
Both in-universe and out, Super doesn’t have much time to address this problem
with super hero Having moved the timeframe of Super Up to just one year before the epilogue of pThere is very little chance for the series to fix the continuity conflict. The Super Manga is currently on hiatus, but it is widely believed that when it returns, it will be Dragon Ball Supers final arc. This means that if these problems are going to be dealt with, the next arc will be the one to do so, and it looks very unlikely that this will be the case.
Supers conflict with ps epilogue can be explained somewhat; Goku has indeed spent several arcs of Super In space at this point, including the scope of the Galactic Patrol Prisoner Saga and the Granola Survivor Saga, and he only returns to Earth momentarily to pick up Gohan in the post-super hero Chapter. Perhaps Goku and Vegeta really were primarily offworld for five years in-universe time, and Goku simply didn’t meet Bulma on any of his return trips to Earth. After all, it would hardly be out of character for Goku to forget to say hi to his friends.
Related
The conflicts with GT They are much bigger and harder to solve, however. It’s simply impossible that Goku and/or Vegeta wouldn’t at least mention their godly forms, even if they weren’t an option for some reason. There is also the absence of Beerus, Whis, and others Super Characters that would presumably still be around at the time of GT. For example, with Broly now as an ally, where was he during the various crises they faced during GT?
Can Dragon Ball Super fix its continuity errors, or should it just be ruled non-canon?
It is not impossible to fix these problems, but changes to canon may be necessary
with Dragon Ball Super‘s extreme popularity, it seems like there is almost no way that it would ever be deemed non-canonical. As something that was guided by Akira Toriyama, Dragon Ball Super has a much greater claim to be canon than GT does, so if anything, GT is the one that should be declared non-canonical when the two conflict. Toy seems extremely reluctant to do this for whatever reason, but with Super Getting closer and closer to the time that GT Is determined, it is a problem that they will have to address sooner or later.
That still leaves the problem of Dragon Ball ps epilogue, however. as part of pIt would be difficult to simply explain the epilogue itself as non-canonical, even if this is the simplest solution. Maybe Dragon Ball Super Can display a new version of​​​​the events seen in ps epilogue, one more consistent with the story of SuperSo offer more of a recon solution than just ditching these p Epilogue in full. with the addition of Dragon Ball Dima To the mix soon, there may be even more continuity problems depending on exactly when the series is set.
Dragon Ball SuperContinuity issues are certainly a headache to deal with, so hopefully the powers that be will make a decision with regard to Dragon Ball Continuation soon.