Although Beetle juice Beetle juice was a huge box office success, this ironically proves how unlikely it is for the director Tim Burton to make another $1 billion film. Put Beetle juice Beetle juiceIn the end, it was clear that the old Tim Burton was back. The unique fusion of gothic horror elements and wacky cartoon humor that animated the director’s best films returned in the belated sequel, which could stand alongside Sleepy hollow, Batman Returns, Big Fishor the original Beetle juice as one of his best. Despite Beetle juice Beetle juiceDespite the plot holes, the film brought back Burton’s sense of fun.
The public evidently agreed as Beetle juice Beetle juice It is the third highest-grossing film of Burton’s entire career. This box office success Beetlejuice 3 much more likely, especially considering what Burton’s other two best performances were. The only Burton films to earn more than Beetle juice Beetle juice they were from 2010 Alice in Wonderland and 2005 Charlie and the Chocolate Factoryboth were remakes rather than original efforts. Beetle juice Beetle juice It was also comfortably Burton’s biggest hit in 14 years, and notably, the horror-comedy sequel was the director’s most critically acclaimed live-action film since 2007’s horror-musical hybrid. Sweeney Todd.
Why Tim Burton is unlikely to make another $1 billion movie
Beetlejuice Beetlejuice proves Burton is moving away from big blockbusters
2012 Frankenweenie surpassed the sequel according to critics, but this only reaffirms the fact that Beetle juice Beetle juice proves Burton is at his best as he revisits his early hits. Beetle juice Beetle juice was the most exciting film the director had made in a long time, precisely because, as a follow-up to his early career success, the sequel was also the most purely Burton film he’s made since. Frankenweenie. While Beetle juice Beetle juiceThe $450 million worldwide box office haul is extremely impressive, proving that Burton’s work won’t attract a $1 billion payday. The director’s unique vision means that his films always have limited appeal.
Alice in Wonderland, from 2010, is one of Burton’s weakest films and its astronomical box office success did not help its director in the following years.
This is not a bad thing, since Beetle juice Beetle juice managed to make almost half a billion on a budget of just $100 million, while staying true to Burton’s vision. While making a $1 billion movie is rarely all bad, it can sometimes mean making one of the worst films of your career. 2010 Alice in Wonderland is one of Burton’s weakest films, and its astronomical box office success didn’t help its director in the years that followed. A series of critical failures such as Miss Peregrine’s Home for Unusual Children, Dark Shadows, Big Eyesand Dumbo followed Alice in Wonderland.
Title |
Budget |
Box office |
RT Score |
---|---|---|---|
Dark Shadows (2012) |
US$150 million |
US$245.5 million |
35% |
Frankenweenie (2012) |
US$39 million |
US$81.5 million |
87% |
Big Eyes (2014) |
US$10 million |
US$29.3 million |
72% |
Miss Peregrine’s Home for Unusual Children (2016) |
US$110 million |
US$296.5 million |
65% |
Dumbo (2019) |
US$170 million |
US$353.3 million |
46% |
The success of Beetlejuice Beetlejuice is much better for Tim Burton than Alice in Wonderland
Burton’s unique style was flattened in Disney’s 2010 live-action film
For Burton, do Beetle juice Beetle juice on a $450 million hit is arguably a bigger success than delivering a $1 billion hit with Alice in Wonderland. Not only did Beetle juice Beetle juice fares much better with critics, but it’s also Burton’s film, on his terms, rather than a studio-driven remake that could have come from any newsboy. The sequel may not be a billion-dollar hit, but ironically it’s a good thing. After all, this means that Burton’s next project will be driven by passion rather than potential profits. Beetle juice Beetle juice proof Tim Burton can make hits while maintaining his unique voice.