Every time a book is adapted into a feature film, there are bound to be some changes. Jurassic Park is no exception to this rule, as there are several missing deaths in the book. Steven Spielberg’s 1993 Oscar-winning film adaptation. Jurassic Park has many key differences from Michael Crichton’s original novel, including the ending. Of course, both versions follow the same general story; A group of characters must fight for their survival when a theme park with living dinosaurs begins to lose control of the reanimated creatures.
The stories become more explicit in their decisions about who will survive to the end. Many of the characters killed in the book are given much easier endings in the book. Jurassic Park movie. These changes can occur for any number of reasons; a desire to maintain a more positive tone, a feeling that the deaths didn’t contribute enough to the story, or even just a desire to maintain a PG-13 rating. Whatever the reason, many popular characters do not have a happy ending in the original book version. Jurassic Park.
6
Sophie
Even babies aren’t safe
Michael Crichton’s novel does not shy away from disturbing images, and the author makes this clear right away. First sections Jurassic Park try to establish that dinosaurs have been reintroduced to the world and that they pose a deadly threat. The novel’s opening provides a broader picture than the film’s opening (in which a park worker is brutally attacked by a velociraptor), offering many scenes of mysterious dinosaur attacks on civilians. In one particularly gruesome scene, a trio of compsognathus attacks and kills a baby named Sophie in a crib in a hospital.
It’s not hard to guess why this scene was not included in Spielberg’s film adaptation. Jurassic Park. The respected director felt that the scene was too gruesome and that it would give the film a much darker tone than he intended. While this scene works well in the novel (which uses a darker overall tone), it would definitely look out of place in the film. Most of the audience would probably have been deterred from watching the rest of the film if this scene had been included.
5
Ed Regis
The gruesome end of a park publicist
If you’ve only ever seen the film version Jurassic ParkYou’ve probably never heard of Ed Regis, the quirky theme park’s head of public relations. Regis was ultimately cut from the film, although some of his traits/actions were redistributed among other characters. In the novel, Regis is killed after the first Tyrannosaurus attack. Thinking he is safe hidden behind some boulders, Regis tries to make his way back to his car. However, his escape is brutally thwarted when he is ambushed by a young T-Rex.
Although Regis’ character was not included, a very similar scene does appear in the film. His place is taken by lawyer Donald Gennaro, who cowardly abandons his children and hides during the attack of the Tyrannosaurus rex. Gennaro is eventually discovered and eaten by a huge dinosaur while trying to take refuge in a nearby bathroom. Although Regis’s character was not considered necessary enough to be included, the filmmakers must have liked the idea of ​​seeing the cowardly character get his comeuppance and rewrote the scene with Gennaro instead.
4
Dr. Henry Wu
Chief geneticist killed by his creation
Although he was not completely cut from the film, Jurassic ParkThe chief geneticist, Dr. Henry Wu (played by B.D. Wong), plays a much smaller role in the film than in the novel. In Crichton’s version of the story, Wu is killed along with John Arnold (Ray Arnold in the film) by a pack of Velociraptors after the park’s power goes out. The idea of ​​Wu being killed by the very creatures he created makes quite a poetic sense.
Wu not only survives in the film version Jurassic Parkbut his character actually returned to all three films later. Jurassic World franchise at the moment. No explicit reason was given as to why Wu’s fate changed so radically in the film, but it can be assumed that it was likely due to his greatly reduced role. The inclusion of a scene where he is mauled by velociraptors would have seemed unnecessary given that his presence in the film was so limited and any blame given to him for the dinosaurs’ presence is minimal.
3
John Hammond
No happy ending for the park owner
Although his personality has changed slightly, John Hammond is the eccentric owner of the titular park in both versions. Jurassic Park. Unlike the film, the new version of Hammond meets a bitter end shortly before he is able to escape the dinosaur-filled island. After injuring his ankle while trekking through the jungle, Hammond experiences a slow, disturbing death after being attacked by a pack of Compsognathus. Lulled by the creature’s venom after being bitten, Hammond offers little resistance as he is eaten alive by the small dinosaurs.
The choice to keep Hammond alive in Jurassic Park The film is largely a result of other changes made to his character. The original version of Hammond was much darker, appearing as a greedy businessman willing to ignore the potential dangers of his actions in the name of financial gain. In contrast, the film version of Hammond (played by Richard Attenborough) is much more kind-hearted and quirky. Killing off this version of Hammond would have meant a sad end for a popular character rather than a satisfying death for a villain.
2
Dr. Ian Malcolm (?)
The mathematician did not survive… or did he?
Jeff Goldblum’s suave portrayal has made Dr. Ian Malcolm one of the most popular characters in cinema. Jurassic Park movies. However, although Malcolm appeared in several films like Jurassic Park And Jurassic World franchise, his character did not actually survive the events of the original book (or so it seems). The charming mathematician is wounded during the same T. rex attack, causing him to be wounded in the film. However, in the novel, Malcolm succumbed to his injuries.
What’s interesting about Malcolm’s demise in the novel is that Michael Crichton undid the character’s death when he released the novel. The Lost Worldcontinuation of the novel, five years later. Malcolm takes the lead The Lost Worldclaiming that reports of his death were premature. It’s understandable why Spielberg left Malcolm’s death out of the film; Why kill off a fan-favorite character if you’re just going to bring him back later anyway?
1
(Almost) All Dinosaurs
Explosive end of the novel
The 1993 film ends with the surviving characters escaping Isla Nublar by helicopter, leaving the Jurassic Park dinosaurs in full control of the island. Original version Jurassic Parkhowever, does not show that humanity is willing to relinquish its control. After the few surviving characters are evacuated, the Costa Rican Air Force begins bombing the island in an attempt to push the dinosaurs back to extinction. Shortly before the end of the novel, it is revealed that the bombing was not entirely successful, as reports are received of dinosaurs roaming the Costa Rican jungle.
The decision to omit the bombing of Isla Nublar was likely made so as not to detract from the film’s triumphant ending. In the film, almost all of the main characters survive and escape the island while John Williams’ holiday music plays in the background. The novel, on the other hand, already has a dark ending, and killing the dinosaurs is just the icing on the cake. Spielberg wisely knew that audiences were watching Jurassic Park will root for the human characters to survive; not for dinosaurs to die.