Any time a book is adapted into a feature film, there are bound to be some changes, and Jurassic Park There is no exception to this rule, as there are several missing deaths from this book. Steven Spielberg’s Oscar-winning 1993 adaptation of Jurassic Park has many key differences from Michael Crichton’s original novel, including the ending. Of course, both versions follow the same general story; A group of characters must fight for their survival when a theme park with live dinosaurs begins to lose its hold on the reanimated creatures.
Where the stories become more distinct is in their decisions of who survives to the end. Many characters who were killed off in the book were given much lighter endings in these Jurassic Park Movie. These changes can occur for any number of reasons; Wanting to keep a more positive tone, feeling that the deaths don’t contribute enough to the story, or even just wanting to keep a PG-13 rating. Whatever the reason may be, Many popular characters were not given their happy endings in the original book version of Jurassic Park.
6
Sophie
Not even small children are safe
Michael Crichton’s novel does not shy away from disturbing images, and the author makes it clear. The first sections of Jurassic Park Seek to establish that dinosaurs have been brought back into the world, and that they pose a deadly threat. The introduction of the novel presents a more expansive view than the opening of the film (in which a park worker is viciously attacked by a velociraptor), offering multiple scenes of mysterious dinosaur attacks on civilians. One particularly gruesome scene features a Komsognathus trio attacking and killing an infant named Sophie In a crib in a hospital.
The distinguished director felt that the scene was simply too gruesome, and that it would set a tone much rougher than he wanted for the film.
It’s not hard to imagine why This scene was not included in Spielberg’s adaptation of Jurassic Park. The distinguished director felt that the scene was simply too gruesome, and that it would set a tone much rougher than he wanted for the film. While this scene works well for the novel (which does use a darker overall tone), it certainly would have felt out of place in the film. Much of the audience would likely have been deterred from watching the rest of the film if this scene had been included.
5
Ed Regis
A furious end for the publicist of the park
If you’ve only ever seen the film version of Jurassic ParkYou’ve probably never heard of Ed Regis, The head of public relations for the unusual theme park. Regis was ultimately cut from the film, although some of his traits/actions were redistributed among other characters. In the novel, Regis is killed in the aftermath of the first Tyrannosaurus attack. Thinking he is safe after hiding behind some boulders, Regis tries to make his way back to his car. However, his escape is cruelly thwarted when he is ambushed by a young T. Rex.
Although the character of Regis is not included, a very similar scene is still in the film. Taking his place, the lawyer, Donald Gennaro, is the one who cowardly abandons the kids and hides during the T. Rex attack. Gennaro is finally discovered and eaten by the massive dinosaur while trying to take shelter in a nearby bathroom. Although the character of Regis was not deemed good enough to be included, the filmmakers must have liked the idea of ​​seeing a cowardly character being considered, and rewrote the scene with Gennaro instead.
4
Dr. Henry III
The chief geneticist was killed by his creation
Although he was not completely cut from the film, Jurassic Parkthe chief geneticist, Dr. Henry Wu (played by BD Wong), takes on a much smaller role in the film than he did in the novel. In Crichton’s version of the story, Wu is killed alongside John Arnold (Ray Arnold in the film) by a pack of velociraptors after the electricity in the park goes down. The idea of ​​Wu being killed by the very creatures he created has a rather poetic feel to it.
Related
Not only does Wu survive in the movie version of Jurassic ParkHowever His character actually returned for all three films in the later ones Jurassic World Franchise Until now. No clear reason is given as to why Wu’s fate was changed so drastically in the movie, but it can be surmised that it is likely due to his heavily reduced role. Including a scene of being mauled by Velociraptors would have felt unnecessary because his presence in the film was so limited, and any blame placed on him for the dinosaurs’ presence was minimal.
3
John Hammond
No happy ending for the owner of the park
Although his personality has changed quite a bit, John Hammond is the eccentric owner of the titular park in both iterations of Jurassic Park. Unlike in the film, the novel version of Hammond meets a bitter end just before he would have been able to escape the dinosaur-filled island. After hurting his ankle while walking in the jungle, Hammond endured a slow, painful death upon being attacked by a compsognathus Pak. Hammond, who was lulled into a state of complacency by the creature’s venom after being bitten, barely put up a fight when he was eaten alive by the small dinosaurs.
The choice to keep Hammond alive in the Jurassic Park Film is largely the result of the other changes made to his character. Hammond’s original version has a much darker feelCome off as a greedy businessman willing to overlook the potential dangers of his actions in the name of financial gain. In contrast, the film version of Hammond (played by Richard Attenborough) is much more kind and whimsical. Killing off this version of Hammond would have meant giving a sad end to a popular character, instead of a satisfying death to a villain.
2
Dr. Ian Malcolm (?)
The mathematician did not survive… or did he?
Thanks to Jeff Goldblum’s awesome picture, Dr. Ian Malcolm has become one of the most popular characters in the Jurassic Park Movies. However, although Malcolm has appearances in multiple films in both these Jurassic Park And these Jurassic World franchise, his character actually did not survive the events of the original book (or, at least, that’s how it seems). The charming mathematician is injured during the same Tyrannosaurus attack that leaves him wounded in the film. In the novel, however, Malcolm succumbs to his injuries.
What is interesting about Malcolm’s death in the novel is that Michael Crichton wound up the death of the character when he released. The Lost WorldThe sequel novel, five years later. Malcolm takes the lead The Lost WorldClaiming that the reports of his death were premature. It’s clear to see why Spielberg would have omitted Malcolm’s death from the film; Why kill off a fan-favorite character if you’re going to bring him back later on anyway?
1
(almost) all the dinosaurs
An explosive end to the novel
The 1993 film ends with the remaining characters fleeing Isla Nublar in a helicopter, leaving the dinosaurs of Jurassic Park in full control of the island. The original version of Jurassic ParkHowever, does not show humanity being as ready to let go of their control. Once the few surviving characters are evacuated, The Costa Rican Air Force proceeds to bomb the island in an attempt to bring the dinosaurs back to extinction. Just before the novel ends, it is revealed that the bombing was not entirely successful, as reports are received of dinosaurs roaming the Costa Rican jungle.
The decision to exclude the bombed scene from Isla Nublar was likely made to avoid detracting from the otherwise triumphant ending to the film.
The decision to exclude the bombed scene from Isla Nublar was likely made to avoid detracting from the otherwise triumphant ending to the film. In the film, almost all the main characters survive and escape the island as John Williams’ solemn score plays in the background. The novel, on the other hand, already has a bad ending, and the killing of the dinosaurs is only the worst. Spielberg wisely knew that audience was watching Jurassic Park would root for the human characters to survive; Not for the dinosaurs to die.