Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2: Ending Explained

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2, The last film of the Harry Potter franchise, saw Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes) defeated and Hogwarts triumphant but left several questions to be answered, from why Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) didn’t die to why he snapped the Elder Wand. As most of the movie featured the battle of Hogwarts, the scenes are filled with suspenseful moments, grief for the loss of several main characters, and eagerness for Harry to win the duel with Voldemort. Although their journey was not without tragedy, the Golden Trio achieved their happy ending. When the flash forward ended and the final shot zoomed in from King’s Cross Station with Harry, Hermione (Emma Watson) and Ron (Rupert Grint) waving goodbye to their children, The Deadly Hallows Part 2 came to a close.

The final scenes of the third act of the movie emphasize the real meaning behind many major moments, such as how Harry Potter did not die after Voldemort’s killing curse, and why it was the Horcrux that was destroyed instead. It was important for the audience to understand the deeper meaning behind such key events, like the moment Harry threw away the Elder Wand that could have been his superpower, and him finally naming his son after Severus Snape (Alan Rickman), the Professor who had mentored him throughout his time at Hogwarts. The end of The Deadly Hallows Part 2 Gives the deeper meaning behind the scenes.

Why Harry didn’t die in the Forbidden Forest

The Horcrux was killed instead

Through Severus Snape’s memory in the Pensive, Harry Potter Learned that he was one of Voldemort’s final Horcruxes that had to be destroyed. This finally led him into the forbidden forest, to face the one who must not name himself, a Harry Potter Ending that many have been waiting for.

Although it made sense in the end that the Killing Curse killed the Horcrux and not Harry, an additional explanation was anchored in the ownership of the Elder Wand, since there was still speculation about the reasons why Harry did not die; After all, the curse could have killed Harry and left Voldemort with his Horcruxes or killed Harry and the Horcruxes with him.

At the end of the movie, Harry figures out that the Elder Wand belongs to him after he disarms Draco Malfoy, who previously disarmed Voldemort and briefly made the wand his. therefore, Since the Elder Wand would not kill its rightful owner, it ended up destroying the Horcruxes in Harry, instead of Harry himself..

The other meaning behind Harry’s survival was Lily Potter’s protection curse that ran in both his and Voldemort’s blood. In fact, Voldemort’s revival included Harry’s blood. Therefore, while Lily’s blood ran in Voldemort’s veins, Harry Potter could not die, which explains why the Killing Curse did not end his life.

How the Expliarmus spell killed Voldemort

The older wand belonged to Harry

In the third and final act of the movie and the franchise, Harry Potter came face-to-face with Voldemort completely without his evil Horcruxes, as they both cast their spells one last time in their most vulnerable forms. The question arose as to how such a harmless spell as the Expelliarmus could end Voldemort’s life, and the explanation lay again in the heart of the Elder Wand.

When the two threw their curses at each other, the curses came together in a beautifully emotional scene with red and green fire lights. C flew into the two. The connection allowed the elder wand to bond with Harry, its rightful owner. Since in the wizarding world, a wand would usually return rather than harm the wizard it chose, the killing curse cast from it rebounded back to Voldemort and led to the final death of He Who Must Not Be Named.

The fatal strike was depicted in yet another Harry Potter Explanation related to the age stick. In the final moments of both the book and movie, Harry knew that he was the true master of the elder state. Therefore, when he threw the Expliarmus head against You-Know-Who’s fatal Avada Kadabra, he understood that it would restore the old age in his hand, and bring Voldemort’s Killing Curse back to him..

Why Harry destroyed the Elder Wand

Harry prevents anyone else from using it

There were many questions and hidden meanings in it The Deadly Hallows. After the death of Dumbledore, who knew exactly how to use its powers, the wand was left to be opposed by evil forces. His power was the reason why the Dark Lord did everything to get it, and it was ultimately one of the details that lead to Voldemort’s death. However, at the end of the movie, it became clear that the Elder Wand belonged to Harry Potter because he was its rightful master.

As seen in the previous seven movies, Harry Potter was a good wizard; He was just, loyal and full of courage, which meant that the older wall was in good hands with its true owner. It therefore left a question mark why Harry got rid of the wand after the battle of Hogwarts. Harry decides to renounce his dangerous power and destroy the wand for the greater good and the peace of the wizarding world.

This is a controversial change from the book, in which Harry uses it to repair his own before vowing to return the Elder Will to Dumbledore’s tomb. And although the movie’s explanation wasn’t directly addressed, it was clear that Harry understood the anger that the Elder Wand had evoked since Fantastic animalsGrindelwald.

What is the meaning behind Harry’s son’s name?

Harry named his son Albus Severus

In the last scene, The Deadly Hallows Part 2 Jump forward 19 years and show Harry Potter and Ginny Weasley married and taking their son to King’s Cross station to await the departure of the Hogwarts Express. Once Harry knelt down to his son, he stated his name, Albus Severus Potter, and told him that he was named after two great wizards of Hogwarts. One of them was famously liked throughout the franchise, while the other was mostly despised until the end; Therefore, it was important to understand the decision behind Harry naming the young boy after Severus Snape.

Although it was clear why Harry would name his son after Dumbledore, who was Hogwart’s most powerful professor, the explanation behind young Potter’s second name was revealed when Severus Snape’s memory in the Pensive disclosed the professor’s eternal love for Lily Peter. He eventually sacrifices himself for Lily’s son, after a lifetime of keeping him a secret while viewers and characters thought the worst of Professor Snape.

The meaning of Albus Severus’s name deepened with Severus Snape being a Slytherin; This way, Harry Potter was finally able to break the taboo around the house that was previously considered “only for evil wizards.”

The Real Meaning of The Deadly Hallows Part 2

Harry chose justice over power

The Harry Potter Movie franchise has been a hit for over two decades now. They started with these Philosophers Stone And his light take on the magical world, and ended with the dark Deadly Hallows Part 2That closed the chapter on an eight-film franchise but also brought explanations to lingering questions about the magical universe created by JK Rowling. It became clear why Harry survived the killing curse, how he was able to disarm and destroy Voldemort, who removed the Elder Wand, and the real reason for naming his son Albus Severus was revealed.

The last Harry Potter The end of the movie was the culmination leading the hero to overcome the villain, and the conclusion of the battle of good conquering evil. Harry destroying the Elder Wand revealed that he chose justice over power, and the final scene allowed the legacy of Snape and Dumbledore to live on..

Viewers who have been a part of the Wizarding World for a long time needed to stay connected to the characters and the fantastical world as they spent years vicariously through them. Therefore, the explained meanings of the movie’s ending revived the magic and allowed the beloved franchise to live on.

How the end of the Deadly Hallows part 2 is received

The end was mostly positive feedback

The movie as a whole received mostly positive feedback from critics and audience members. There was some initial pushback about the book being split into two movies, but because the journey to find the Horcruxes and finally defeat Voldemort took so long, it made sense. Most complaints about the movie itself are that it was too long, but to give all the characters that are still remaining their ends, the length was needed to explore them all.

Critics applauded the film as a satisfying conclusion to the film series. Although many characters lost their lives in the climactic battle of Hogwarts, the deaths highlighted the cost of war. The battle between Harry and Voldemort brought the movie full circle and provided the only ending to Voldemort the story could have – death at the hands of the man he marked as his equal.

The biggest complaints about the ending itself came from critics and fans who disliked the style of the epilogue. Over a decade after Harry’s defeat of Voldemort, the book’s epilogue was adapted to end the movie. Most criticism involved the attempt to age the core actors. Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint and Bonnie Raitt looked more like kids pretending to be adults than they even looked their own ages in the epilogue. Critics could pass this though, because it meant not restarting the actors for the final sequence.

Is The Deadly Hallows ending different from the book?

There are some key differences between them

While the actual ending of Harry Potter and the Deadly Hallows Part 2 Is the epilogue for the novel, there are key moments near the end of the movie that are very different from the book. Two of these moments were not well received by fans.

One is exactly how Voldemort’s death is shown. After his battle with Harry Potter (which is also extended from what is shown in the book), Voldemort doesn’t just die, his body intact like the average person. Instead, in the movie, he crumbles to dust right in front of Harry. This scene is a bit of a head-scratcher because it implies to the audience that Voldemort is no longer human, when the crux of his story is that he will always be human despite all the measures he has taken to be more than that.

The scene would also raise some questions for anyone who wasn’t actually present at Voldemort’s death. What is there to prove that Harry is victorious? Voldemort has a well-known history of facing his death and of surviving without a body. Crumbling to dust would be suspect. Although it makes for an interesting visual effect in the movie, it doesn’t really serve the story.

After his defeat by Voldemort, Harry also breaks the Elder Wand in half So that no one else can use its power. He does this while he still doesn’t have his own wand because the wand that chose him is broken. In this book, however, he uses the elder wand to fix his own.

That never happens in the movie. If it did, and then he snapped the elder stick in half, book loyalists probably would have been okay with him breaking it in half. As it stands, it seems he’s leaving himself without an outlet to use his magic instead of simply stopping others from being corrupted by a magical artifact.

It makes room for scriptwriters and directors to make changes when novels are adapted to the screen. They are budgetary concerns and streamlining of storylines can be necessary. The changes to Harry Potter and the Deadly Hallows Part 2However, did not make a seat.