Summary
-
Films like Rust And The Crow Highlight the need for better gun safety measures on set, despite Quentin Tarantino’s preference for using real firearms.
-
The thrill of shooting live rounds is not worth the risk of tragedy that using real guns on set can bring, as shown by past incidents.
-
For his part, Tarantino believes that real guns have a decent track record on film sets, as there have only been two major incidents over the years.
Quentin Tarantino Shares a controversial take on the subject of using real guns on a film set. The topic has been frequently debated since 2021, when cinematographer Halina Hutchins was tragically shot and killed on the set of Rust When Alec Baldwin fired a gun, he was told that the weapon contained no live rounds. The 2024 reimaging of The Crow Further reignited the discussion because of actor Brandon Lee’s death in an accidental shooting while filming the 1994 version. The 2024 film banned all real guns from the set.
While on the Club Random with Bill Maher Podcast (via Variety), Tarantino explains why he is against using fake guns on film sets Despite the tragedies that have occurred. He emphasized the positive impact that the use of real guns and live rounds can have during the filming of a project and how this effect is not something that can be recreated during the post-production process. Tarantino also highlighted the entertainment industry’s overall success story of using firearms on sets. Check out his comments below:
I guess I can add digital erections to porn movies, but who wants to look at that? It is exciting to shoot the blanks and to see the orange, the real orange fire, not pretend orange fire.
For as many guns as we’ve shot off in movies, we only have two examples of people being shot on set by a gun mishap. This is a very good record.
Rust and the crow are reason enough to use fake guns
Better gun safety is needed
Despite the points Tarantino makes about the overall success story of gun safety on film sets, the tragic incidents that occurred on the sets involving actors in The Crow And Rust Provide substantial evidence that real guns and live rounds should not be used during filming. The thrill that shooting live rounds adds to a film is not a justifiable trade-off to the inherent risk of such practices. Necessary safety measures are more important than needlessly risking the lives of cast and crew members.
Tarantino’s direction, the cinematography, the actors, the stories themselves, and even the action would remain just as resonant without using real fireworks.
An actor should be able to convincingly portray the intended emotion of a scene without having to rely on an actual firearm.And a director should also be able to direct a scene really without this. Many projects require much more imagination and difficult circumstances to adapt to than not being able to fire a real gun with live rounds. If such adaptations can be made for other reasons, there is no reason why this adaptation cannot also be made.
As known as gun-related action is in Inglorious bastards, Django UnchainedAnd other Tarantino movies, the action is just one of many elements that made the films well-received. Tarantino’s direction, the cinematography, the actors, the stories themselves, and even the action would remain just as resonant without using real fireworks. Quentin Tarantino Should see Rust And The Crow Like tragedies that have shown that the industry needs to do better Instead of reducing them to statistical anomalies.
Source: Club Random with Bill Maher (via Variety)