10 unpopular opinions about famous films

0
10 unpopular opinions about famous films

No discourse on cinema is complete without hot scenes. The more outrageous and seemingly indefensible an opinion, the more entertaining the opinion will be. that’s it. One of the best feelings in the world of film discussion is the realization that a radical claim becomes meaningful by hearing the evidence, which is often substantial. For example, establishing that Janice deserves empathy and isn’t as annoying as people claim is one of the most unpopular opinions on Friends.

Without strong arguments that would actually change someone’s opinion, listening to hot scenes is boring. They are just remixes of others; opinions embellished with custom effects and have as much substance as a meaningless vanity project. Unpopular opinions for shows like Game of Throneswhich are more than just famous, are therefore a mix of everything-changing theories and random claims made to stay in the zeitgeist. But unpopular opinions about famous films like Barbie are truly unpopular because there is a significant popular position to oppose in these cases.

10

The Notebook’s Central Romance Is Toxic

Shouldn’t be celebrated as a generational story of true love

Adapted from the novel of the same name by Nicholas Sparks, The Notebook is a romantic drama that follows a couple who fall in love in the 1940s. Duke, an older man, tells the story of two young lovers whose lives have never aligned well with one another. in your nursing home. Reading the pages of the notebook, the film continues to move from the present to the past to tell the story of the one who got away.

Director

Nick Cassavetes

Release date

June 25, 2004

Execution time

124 minutes

It rightly received a low score from critics on Rotten Tomatoes, The Notebook is an inexplicably beloved “romance” film based on the Nicholas Sparks novel of the same name. While there is undoubtedly good chemistry between lead pair Ryan Gosling and Rachel McAdams, and the film ends on a bittersweet moment of pure, lasting romantic love, the central couple for most of the film is simply toxic. Gosling’s Noah practically threatens McAdams’ Allie with suicide in the name of asking her out, which is a significant red flag.

The premise of the movie is that they were made for each other, so no matter where they are in their lives, they will always try to choose each other if possible. But if that comes at the cost of treating other partners as if they were disposable, or cheating on a current partner, then it’s an excuse to be a bad person. And in case Sparks fans forget, Allie slaps Noah for breaking up with her. This novel is anything but idyllic. They are both horrible people who only bring out the worst in each other.

9

TRON: The legacy deserves more recognition

Tron: Legacy is the sequel to the 1982 cult classic Tron, in which Sam Flynn (Garrett Hedlund) receives a sign from his long-lost father, Kevin Flynn (Jeff Bridges). His search leads him to the Grid, a virtual reality created by his father, who is trapped inside. Father and son must work together with the help of Quorra (Olivia Wilde) to stop Clu, an evil program, from escaping the Grid and invading the real world.

Director

José Kosinski

Release date

December 7, 2010

Writers

Edward Kitsis, Adam Horowitz

Execution time

2h 5m

With TRON: Ares Slated for release next year, the franchise is finally being talked about again, but aside from cult followings, TRON is vastly underestimated. While TRON: Legacy There are some pacing issues that make the climax feel rushed, there aren’t enough flaws in the film to explain why it remains dormant. The best part of the film is, without a doubt, the soundtrack by Daft Punk, whose electronic notes complement the futuristic and techno-visual aesthetics of the world.

TRON: Legacy it also features a talented cast who are more than up to the task of capturing the emotional thread of the narrative whenever the display of cool stunts and visual design takes a backseat to the progress of the plot. Although there is a bit of an exposition dump halfway through the film, TRON: LegacyThe tradition of is solid and makes the world feel livable and complex with politics and genuine interests involved. The father-son relationship could be better developed, but as far as science fiction films go, TRON: Legacy It’s not flawed enough to be ignored as it is.

8

Tokyo Drift is the best fast and furious movie

It’s a refreshing break from the usual over-the-top antics

One of the coolest things a car can do is skid. So, it’s not a surprise that there is a Fast and Furious film entirely focused on drifting, as the main focus of the franchise is vehicular stunts. Or rather, it was, before a comically exaggerated emphasis on family and ignorance of the laws of physics became the franchise’s selling points. Moving to a different location and focusing on characters other than the usual suspects of a Fast and Furious movie is apparently the best thing for the franchise, because Tokyo Drift has the most coherent plot with real heart this.

Tokyo Drift It is the only grounded film in the franchise.

With cars not flying and people having regular worries like impressing their crush and making enough money to finance their lifestyle, Tokyo Drift It is the only grounded film in the franchise. The stunts are still exciting and visually appealing because the cars spinning around each other while spiraling down narrow tracks are anything but boring. It may be the lowest-grossing film, but Tokyo Drift features the best Fast and Furious character in Han. His aloof demeanor and smooth speaking style make him the perfect supporting character for the story of Tokyo Driftwhich moves faster than the cars featured in it.

7

Kristen Stewart did a good acting job in Dusk

The source material is to blame for the bland characterization

When Dusk was first released, gained a cult following, but became one of the most popular book adaptation film franchises. However, most viewers had two opinions: the story is stupid and Kristen Stewart can’t act. People still make bad criticisms of Stewart’s career because of DuskBut she didn’t even do that bad of a job. Bella Swan is a famous, one-dimensional character who has almost no personality development in the four Dusk books that have been adapted into films. Stewart is appropriately uninteresting in her portrayal of the character.

Each character in Dusk has a backstory of sorts and goes through a challenging experience that fundamentally impacts who they are as a person. Bella also goes through some traumatizing experiences, but her entire personality is based on being obsessed with Robert Pattinson’s Edward or leaning on Taylor Lautner’s Jacob. Feminist interpretations of the film are justified by reading it as a form of gaze inversion and an exaggerated reinterpretation of the sexy vampire trope. Dusk It’s not boring, Bella is, and Stewart makes sure viewers know that.

6

Jack Sparrow is equally fun On strange tides As in the main trilogy

He still goes on unbelievable adventures and manages to get himself out of any trouble

Although the first three Disney films Pirates of the Caribbean franchise are undoubtedly the best and form a solid trilogy, On strange tides is unfairly dismissed as being a weaker entry. Orlando Bloom’s Will and Keira Knightley’s Elizabeth are absolutely part of the charm because they provide the emotional hooks for most of the stories. However, the true MVP of the franchise will always be Johnny Depp’s “Captain” Jack Sparrow, who is in On strange tides and fun as always. The first scene features one of his most elaborate escape sequences.

Sparrow’s combat style, using the environment to gain unfair advantages, his reliance on fortune to survive the day, and his quintessential charismatic personality that is simultaneously repulsive and endearing, are all present and less filtered than ever. Without the usual supporting characters, the focus is almost entirely on Jack, as he continues to manipulate people, somehow still doing the right thing, and ends up rejecting the courageous heroine, played by Penélope Cruz, on his way to getting drunk drunk. looking for your next adventure.

5

Jar Jar Binks Doesn’t Ruin Star Wars: A Phantom Menace

There are enough good things to like about the film

Although he is unanimously one of the most hated characters in cinema history, and rightfully so, Jar Jar Binks just doesn’t have enough screen time in Star Wars: The Phantom Menace completely ruin the movie as some of his enemies like to claim. For those who watch the franchise in chronological order, it is the first film they see. In terms of introducing people to the lore of the Force, the concept of the Jedi, the politics that define Star Warsand the lightsabers go, Phantom Menace does a fantastic job.

Darth Maul, although underused in the film, is one of the coolest villains of all time; the duel between him and Qui-Gon Jinn is tied with the high-octane pod race with young Anakin Skywalker as the best scenes in Phantom Menace. Ahmed Best didn’t deserve the unfair and hurtful backlash he received for voicing Jar Jar, and more importantly, he’s too insignificant to ruin an otherwise good film. Not the best Star Wars film, but other than the Midichlorian tests, it doesn’t give a worse error than any other film before the sequel trilogy.

4

Joker is only a good film for those who haven’t seen Taxi Driver yet

Blatantly copies almost everything from Scorsese’s classic

Todd Phillips’ filmography has the craziest twist ever. He went from Expiration date and the Hangover trilogy to make the gritty crime thriller Clownwhich is a masterpiece about how society’s cruelty manufactures psychopaths. At least that’s what fans of Clown I would like to claim. He maybe should have kept doing comedies because all Phillips did was remake Taxi driverbut without recontextualizing the protagonist from the 1970s. Arthur Fleck is not the real Joker, nor even interesting, but a spokesman for the belief that violence is the solution to privileging disparity.

Clown It’s a bad movie because it’s a bad remake.

Clown he follows Taxi driverthe steps of presenting a protagonist with complete disdain for the very filthy behavior around him that he himself exhibits, but unlike Scorsese’s film, Clown it is not self-conscious. Taxi driver It works as a noir thriller because the film establishes beyond a shadow of a doubt that there is no reason to tolerate its protagonist’s actions and that he deserves his judgment. Even if we think of it as a remake of the 1976 film and unrelated to the comic book character of the same name, Clown It’s a bad movie because it’s a bad remake.

It has a weak plot that doesn’t stand the test of time

Before James Cameron returned with another avatar film, Avengers: Endgame it was the highest-grossing film of all time. An impressive feat, the achievement can only be attributed to one thing: fans’ nostalgia for the three-part saga made up of 23 films that ended with it. The first major flaw is the highly convenient explanation of how time travel works. Not only does the theory not survive scrutiny with imaginary scenarios, but the film decides to dismiss Back to the future for having a weaker time travel theory that is unnecessarily aggressive.

None of the character deaths are given due diligence in the film, in terms of representing grief. The infamous funeral scene, where none of the actors look as sad as their characters should be because they didn’t know what scene they were filming, is a good example of how poorly done Avengers: Endgame it really is. Even as nostalgia bait, it fails to provide real closure, using the death of the other significant character to set up the climax, which begins by cutting to the scene where the characters mourn her. In fact, it took deleted scenes to improve Avengers: Endgame.

2

The Snyder Cut Is Just an Improvement on the Justice League Theatrical Cut

Being slower and prettier doesn’t solve narrative problems

One of the most talked about superhero films of recent years is Zack Snyder’s Justice Leaguecausing a joke in Barbie about the director’s cut. It took a petition to convince WB to allow the release of Zack Snyder’s four-hour uncut version. Snyder promised that the unseen footage would resolve all issues with Justice League. Instead, it’s literally slower. The camera slowly pans over beautifully framed picturesque landscapes to fill out the running time. Instead of context and backstory, the Snyder Cut just adds an avant-garde aesthetic, as if all it needed to do was look artsy.

The characters still feel like they don’t know why they were chosen as the protagonists of the story, Superman’s death is still mostly ceremonial with emotional effects underexplored, the visual effects of Flash running are still horrible, and the climax still feels rushed. The first half turns into a slow burn in the Snyder Cut, but it also drags down the theatrical cut. In fact, this part should have been more restricted, taking time to explore the characters’ individual lives and motivations. Snyder’s Flawed Vision for Justice League Can’t Be Fixed with two extra hours of film.

1

Interstellar is poorly written and overrated due to the visuals

None of the main female characters seem like real people

It’s difficult to find a film as celebrated by moviegoers as Interstellar. Nolan’s film about a desolate future that can only be escaped by traveling through a black hole has stunning visuals, but that doesn’t absolve it of its writing flaws. Nolan is famous for writing one-dimensional female characters that are not sufficiently developed. This problem is most evident in Interstellarwhere Anne Hathaway is the protagonist. Despite her importance to the plot, the character does not receive strong motivations or even a satisfactory conclusion. It’s one of the harsh realities Interstellar to reconcile in a new observation.

Although it is celebrated for being a “smart people’s film”, Interstellar uses a lot of armchair physics. It would have been more engaging if Interstellar it simply committed itself to being fictional rather than becoming Nolan’s platform to prove that time travel can be done. Hans Zimmer provides an incredible soundtrack in “Cornfield Chase” that will always live rent-free in people’s heads. But the entire film should pay the rent for having a coherent emotional thread that isn’t just introduced when there are no more cool visuals to show off. The weak script doesn’t deserve the reputation it has.

Leave A Reply