Quentin Tarantino’s 2004 film scores poorly on fight ending accuracy, and expert demonstrates the right way

0
Quentin Tarantino’s 2004 film scores poorly on fight ending accuracy, and expert demonstrates the right way

Martial arts and katana expert explains what Quentin Tarantino says Kill Bill: Volume 1 makes a mistake in one fight scene and demonstrates the correct technique. Tarantino’s first film, released in 2003. Kill Bill the film became its sequel Jackie Brown (1997). The action film, starring Uma Thurman as The Bride, is about a former assassin who seeks revenge on the team of killers who left her for dead. There are numerous exciting action scenes throughout the film.

In a recent video for Insider, Sensei Seki Nobuhide analyzes the Bride’s fight against Gogo Yubari in Kill Billshowing her opponent making several critical mistakes when it comes to using her weapon, an iron ball at the end of a chain.

Seki shows that not only is the iron ball too large to be used in practice, but the fighting techniques used in the scene are less effective than they could be. As seen in the video (the relevant section starts at 6:20), the expert then demonstrates how the Bride’s opponent was supposed to disarm and destroy Thurman’s character using a chain against a katana. Read Seki’s analysis or watch the video below:

“The reason chained iron balls are so effective against a katana is that if they can be maneuvered successfully, they will snap out. The iron ball flies at you before you can react with your katana. But this technique is only used if you are good at it. It is impossible to swing an iron ball of this size.

“The chain is wrapped around the sword, which is held like this. It would be quite tiring to swing the sword up and down like that. So the best thing to do would be to just rush forward. If you hold the sword like this and swing it down, the way the chain is wound will change. Sometimes the chain may simply slip off the sword.

“The scene shows the girl wrapping a chain around a sword and yanking it out. She should have gotten closer and struck her opponent with her katana while she was being pulled. Step back a little, keeping the chain tight, and block the attack like this. The enemy is not retreating. Instead, they push it forward with their weight. You turn to wrap the chain around the sword. The chain then becomes entangled in the sword.

“From here, turn back to front. Continue to hold the weight with both hands and pull the chain tightly, then pull the chain towards you so that the opponent’s sword is attached to your body, which immobilizes the opponent.

The reality rating for this scene is a four. [out of 10]. The reason for this is that the scene is nice to watch, but it lacks reality.”

What the inaccuracy of Bill’s murder means for the film’s legacy

Kill Bill – Tarantino classic

Tarantino has never been a director particularly concerned with reality. IN Inglourious Basterds (2009), for example, he rewrites history and has his American heroes shoot Adolf Hitler in a movie theater. The fact that Kill Bill inaccurate in terms of describing katana fighting techniques, so not that surprisingand this is unlikely to affect the film’s reputation.

Connected

Kill Bill boasts an impressive result of 85% Rotten Tomatoes from critics and 81% from viewers. The film, produced on a budget of $30 million, ultimately grossed $180.9 million worldwide, making it a huge success. Moreover, the film lacks precision and Tarantino’s stylistic mastery undoubtedly contributed to the film’s success.. Kill Bill features a variety of fight scenes, many of which feature geysers of gushing blood that are intentionally over-the-top.

Our take on the lack of realism in Kill Bill

Why Realism in a Tarantino Film Doesn’t Matter (But It’s Still Worth an Analysis)


Daryl Hannah dressed as a nurse stands over Uma Thurman in Kill Bill

While the film’s absurdity and bold stylistic choices are part of Kill Bill The fascination of the universe nevertheless remains an interesting exercise in analyzing what it does right and what it does wrong. Seki clearly understands that inaccuracies are made in the name of increasing entertainment value, but sharing what is realistic and what is not is an effective way of sharing martial arts knowledge..

Knowing where a film deviates from reality is not only purely informative, but also speaks volumes about Tarantino’s filmmaking process and why he made certain creative choices. Although Kill Bill: Volume 1The film’s level of realism may be low, but that certainly doesn’t make the film any less fun to watch.

Source: Insider

Leave A Reply