Directed by Raja Gosnell and written by James Gunn2002’s live-action Scooby-doo Movie included a twist that shook the foundation of the entire franchise. Praised by many as one of the best Scooby-doo In movies, the project was the first foray of the beloved characters into live action. While There were others Scooby-doo Live-action adaptations since The 2002 movie premiere, it stands out not only for being the first, but also for making a bold story decision that separated it further from the animated source material.
Although the success of The first live-fight Scooby-doo Movie resulted in a sequel Also, the follow-up did not perform quite as well at the box office. As a result, the cast and crew disbanded after only two movies. While reviews were mixed for both films, the first live action entry in the Scooby-doo Franchise should still be applauded for its bold creative choices and attempts to shake up what might otherwise have been a thoroughly predictable affair. Gunn’s script wasn’t just a love letter to those Scooby-doo TV shows, but also made an attempt to surprise the existing fan base.
Scooby-Doo’s real monster twist was a brilliant change
The Scooby-Doo cartoon is famous for its “man in a mask” twist
The biggest trope of the original Scooby-doo Show is the fact that real monsters do not exist, but the audience is reminded of this every week. Despite being heavily associated with spooky monsters and scary ghosts, each episode ends with the unmasking of a human villain who has been pulling the wool over everyone’s eyes with a complex series of smoke, mirrors and other deceptive means. When 2002s Scooby-doo As the movie begins, the case of the Luna Ghost strongly suggests that the live-action adaptation faithfully incorporates the villainous set of the source material. however, The unmasking of Old Man Smithers is a huge misdirect.
Confirmed by the Luna Ghost that was yet another Scooby-doo Fone, the demons being flesh-and-blood animals (rather than a clever illusion) catches both the audience and the mystery inc. Team off-guard.
The spooky island demons that are real monsters is James Gunn’s best writing decision of the entire movie. Confirmed by the Luna Ghost that was yet another Scooby-doo Fone, the demons being flesh-and-blood animals (rather than a clever illusion) catches both the audience and the mystery inc. Team off-guard. Linda Cardellini’s Velma is so convinced that the demons are fake that she makes a very definite attempt to “unmask” one of them during the movie, which is perhaps the point of no return for Scooby-doos biggest tradition is shelved for the rest of the story.
Scooby-Doo made a valiant attempt to make changes to the formula for the first live action movie
James Gunn chose not to pursue every Scooby-Doo trope
It would have been very easy for James Gunn to write what would have essentially been a feature-length episode of Scooby-doo. It is possible that such an effort would have even been received better than the movie that was produced. luckily, The writer made an effort to make key changes to the time-honored Scooby-doo Formula And consider it interesting for those who have and have not dealt with the source material.
Gunn has since explained that Scooby-dooS PG rating is never intentionalAnd suggested that the original cut is a little edgier than what was released. A tweet from the movie’s writer says it was initially rated R, despite Gunn, Gosnell, and the producers all aiming for a PG-13 rating. After that, cuts were made and the movie became a more censored version than planned. So, 2002 Scooby-doo was almost even more different from the source material.
The movie’s real monster twist prevented the classic Scooby-Doo villain reveal
Mr. Mondavarious’ unmasking of Scooby-Doo is unconventional
Scooby-doos opening sequence ends with the Luna Ghost being unmasked and revealed as Old Man Smithers. This kind of moment is crucial to almost every episode of the animated show, so it’s great that a version of it was in the movie. That said, the story’s main villain in the live-action adaptation isn’t human, so the movie’s finale is a little different when it’s up against the source material. When it was revealed that Rowan Atkinson’s Emile Mondavarious is the bad guyIt feels predictable, but also unusual.
Related
By the rules of the source material, it makes perfect sense for Mondavarious to be the bad guy, as he is the first notable character the team interacts with when they arrive at the scene of the crime. However, in the cartoon, it would have been Atkinson’s character wreaking havoc in a monster costume before being defeated and unmasked. instead, Mondavarious was car piloted by Scrappy-DooAnd what would have been a traditional unmasking resulted in Fred peeling off the protective layer of “skin” to reveal the robot’s inner-workings.
Of course, in the context of a live-action movie, James Gunn’s choices fit the scenario much better. in his heart, Scooby-doo is still a mystery franchise. Although the animated show is very predictable when it comes to the solution to the mysteries, the movie has a responsibility to restore an aura of mysticism, and it was masterfully done. James Gunn The times were not followed Scooby-doo framework, but what he wrote was a brilliant alternative.
Source: James Gunn