Hodor actor Kristian Nairn defended the ending of Game of Thrones Five years after it aired, explains why he enjoyed the last episodes of the show. The end of Game of Thrones Became one of the most polarizing events in television history, with many unhappy due to major character changes, such as Daenerys Targaryen (Emilia Clarke) becoming a tyrant and burning down King’s Landing. While the series finale did not dissuade the franchise from expanding with the ongoing House of the DragonIt made the original series less beloved by many due to its controversial choices.
Talk to Screen Rant, Nairn revealed he enjoyed the final season of Game of ThronesAnd was disappointed by the overall reception it received. The actor explained how he believed the seeds of Daenerys burning King’s Landing were planted throughout the show, justifying her character’s turn once it happened. However, he admitted that the series should have had more episodes to make the event, comparing the later episodes to the work of director Michael Bay.
He warned that too House of the Dragon Will likely take his time with his own dragon-based action, warning the delivery of Daenerys’ destruction is likely what made the ending so polarizing. Even so, he believes that the last episode had incredible shots, Compare Tyrion Lannister (Peter Dinklage) walking through a crowd of the dead to a Renaissance painting. Check out what Nairn had to say below:
It’s not perfect, no. But also keep in mind I’m not a scriptwriter, neither are 99.99% of people. There are some who think they are, but I know I’m not, so I have that. So [the response] Really disappointed me. I don’t feel any responsibility for it, of course, because I’ve been dead for a long time. But it disappointed me because the show was held in such high regard, and I do not think it deserves it. I don’t think there was a way they could have ended it to keep people happy. There’s never been a show in the history of television, I believe—maybe Breaking Bad, maybe—where people were so invested in their characters and I think everybody had their own ultimate fantasy of what was going to happen in The end with Daenerys, and any separation from it, especially this extreme, will tear them apart.
Although people say that Daenerys acted out of character and stuff and so quickly, but I just don’t understand how they didn’t see that throughout the show. I was waiting for it to happen the whole way. The signs were there boys. She actually said at one stage that as soon as Dragon is big enough, she’s going to burn King’s Landing’s ass. And what happened? She did exactly what she said. The only criticism I have, and it’s not really a criticism, because I understand limited issues and things, but I wish it was longer.
I don’t think that the longer episodes worked. I think it would have been better to have more episodes. The Michael Bay thing, that’s how I explain it. There was a bit of a sprinkling of Michael Bay in the last season with the explosions and fate of dragons. They gave us some of it, which gave us a hunger for them, and then all of a sudden, they were like, “You sit here, okay?” R is not as appetizing as you thought. Sometimes the idea of ​​dinner is better than dinner.
They are doing something similar now with House of Dragons too. Everyone is waiting for the dragon fights and I am trying to warn people. Of course, I know the Game of Thrones franchise, and you might be waiting 20 years for this, you realize, but maybe it will be next season, who knows? But I wouldn’t set my watch. I don’t think I would be afraid of that. I just want people to be happy with it, because I really enjoyed it. The scenes with Peter [Dinklage] Walking through the ruins and people saying, ‘Oh God, I really wanted Cersei to die a really horrible death.’ And what about their death? It was like a Renaissance painting. It was art. So much beautiful work, the music and stuff, and people are going ‘that s**t.’ what are you talking about
What Nairn’s opinion on the Game of Thrones finale says about the show
The final episodes still have redeeming qualities
Nairn’s opinion echoes how some have enjoyed the direction of recent episodes, praising the cast of Game of Thrones for their performances. However, his criticism of how The series should have slowed down to better justify Daenerys’ antagonists Reflects the mixed opinions of audiences and critics when the final episodes aired. As of writing, season 8, episode 5, “The Bells” holds a 49% critics score on Rotten Tomatoes, while the series finale, “The Iron Throne,” comes in at 47%.
Related
While the recent episodes of the show have been criticized by viewers and professional critics, Season 8 is still praised for its high production value and for offering a definitive end to the characters’ stories. In retrospect, it also laid the foundation for House of the Dragon To top it off, set a high bar for the quality expected of shows in Westeros. With the upcoming A knight of the seven kingdoms After expanding the franchise, it is clear that the last episode of the main show did not permanently damage the stories in its universe.
Our take on Nairn’s Game of Thrones finale review
The last episode just needed more development
While Nairn defended the final episodes of Game of ThronesIt’s clear that the show needs a lot more development for its story to feel justified and make sense with the direction it’s taking. Even so, there are redeeming qualities to the story, such as the many twists, which might have felt earned if given a little more time to develop. This makes the actor’s attitude on the final episodes more understandable, with their developments simply being powdered by a lack of time spent to ensure that they flow properly.