Wolfs is the great sequel we never got to George Clooney’s 90% Rotten Tomatoes action movie 17 years ago

It’s fun to think about Apple TV+s Wolf like A sequel to the classic 2007 George Clooney crime thriller. George Clooney leads the Wolf Cast alongside long-time friend and collaborator Brad Pitt, and while the movie isn’t the actor’s best movie, the two stars are as charming and fun to watch as ever. Directed by Spider-Man: No Way Home Filmmaker Jon Watts, Wolf was met with a mediocre response from critics on Rotten Tomatoes, which gave it a 68% score.

Despite its score, there are many movies like Wolf Which are worth exploring further, including some that involve Pitt or Clooney in a similar character archetype. In the 2024 movie, both stars play fixers, people who get paid to arrive at crime scenes and clean up messes for wealthy clients. This type of character is seen in movies like Pulp fiction With Winston ‘The Wolf’ Wolf or show like Breaking bad With Mike Ehrmantraut. For those who did enjoy Wolf And need other options, look no further than Michael Clayton.

George Clooney played a lonely fixer in Michael Clayton

Anyone who likes wolves needs to try Michael Clayton

Michael Clayton is undoubtedly one of George Clooney’s best movies, and it probably is The best film in the fixer subgenre of crime movies. In it, Clooney plays the titular character, a man who cleans up situations for a prestigious law firm. When he is sent to deal with a man suffering from a mental breakdown, he realizes the morality at stake working for the company he does, resulting in a sudden desire to do the right thing. However, his personal debts have accumulated, so failing to complete the job would be catastrophic for him.

While Michael Clayton And Wolf are tonally far apart, it’s fun to think that Clooney’s character is the same person in both. Michael Clayton is a movie that examines the psychology of the fixing job, inviting its audience to experience the intensity and desperation the main character feels. Meanwhile, Wolf Explore the lives of men who spent decades working as fixers, examining how they essentially suffered from moral bankruptcyCausing them to lose touch with any semblance of a personal life.

How Wolff differs from Michael Clayton

Wolf is a much less serious movie

Despite adding even more star power to the mix, Wolf is a far cry from the quality of Michael Clayton. The latter is such an intelligent, sophisticated film with a fascinating study of corruption and moral dilemmas. Wolf is much more stupid in comparison, which is not inherently a bad thing. However, the more serious moments and ideas in the film that Can coincide with something like Michael Clayton Suffer due to the tonal inconsistency. The humor is the best part of Wolf At the expense of Pitt and Clooney’s star power, but it does not compliment the dramatic side of the film.