Married at first sight season 18 may have just begun, but there are already issues affecting viewers’ perception of the series, leaving many wondering when there will be changes to the casting and matchmaking process. Throughout most Married at first sightIn the long run, the mechanics behind the casting and matchmaking portions of the series have been the same. MAFS Contestants have had the opportunity to sign up for the series and be selected to be matched, and matchmakers have been using the information they receive to try to establish solid romantic connections for the contestants.
While the back-and-forth isn’t surprising or revealing, the system itself hasn’t worked in recent seasons of the series. Whether due to lack of skill on the part of the Married at first sight experts, an inadequate way to gather basic information about potential cast members from the casting team, or a mixture of these and other issues, the series has struggled to make successful matches for years. Although many asked MAFS change something from the inside out to make better decisionsthings haven’t improved in recent years.
Although the conduct of the Married at first sight pundits haven’t always been something fans tolerate or appreciate; they are the group viewers should trust. Unfortunately, most of the matches on the show don’t work out and that’s to be expected after the last few unsuccessful years of MAFS. Experts couldn’t figure out which problems to addressnor have they been able to find a solution to the problems the casting team has on the show, which often brings them MAFS participants who are not telling the truth.
Since things haven’t changed, many viewers have called for the current panel to be removed. Married at first sight experts. While things would clearly change if Dr. Pepper Schwartz, Dr. Pia Holec, and Pastor Cal Roberson left the series, their departure from the show may not mean there will be more successful departures. Instead of demanding its replacement, some Married at first sight viewers discussed the idea of ​​a change to their processalong with a change in how the series is released.
Many people are interested in joining MAFS, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that all of them fit into the series’ cast. With a change in the casting process and changes in the way the MAFS experts make their combinations, things could improve for the program’s lack of success rate. While it may not be entirely feasible, a change could be just what Married at first sight it needs.
8
MAFS should redo its casting questionnaire
It is very wide and long
Although the Married at first sight the casting questionnaire is available for everyone to see during the casting process, some viewers are not aware of the questions potential participants ask before initial interviews be in the series. Sometimes topical questions lack the depth necessary to truly understand candidates’ relationship history, emotional preparedness, or their commitment to an authentic marriage. While the MAFS questionnaire has general compatibility questions, they don’t delve into communication, conflict resolution or attitudes about finances and family planning. Revamping the questionnaire with comprehensive questions would allow experts to explore candidates in more depth.
While The questionnaire is just the first step in MAFS participation processIt’s the easiest place for candidates to lie about what’s going on in their lives, relationships, and mindset. The questionnaire itself should focus more on the candidate’s mental health and goals, allowing experts to understand whether the candidate is worth pursuing at the moment because of how they deal with triggers, stressors, or past traumas. Overall, a comprehensive questionnaire would go a long way toward improving the Married at first sight casting and matchmaking processes, driving healthier and more successful relationships.
7
MAFS must make potential cast members pass mental health screenings before casting
There should be more psychological tests
Along with the Married at first sight questionnaire, cast members must undergo some serious mental health screening before being admitted into the matchmaking process. While the MAFS Experts perform some mental health practices with participants, most of the mental health screenings that participants must undergo are kept confidential and carried out between the initial questionnaire and the matchmaking process. These practices are not enough MAFS on screennor are they ever actually spoken.
Married at first sight should consider some more intensive mental health screenings during the initial phase of the casting process. Instead of waiting until cast members are almost at the point of being matched, MAFS They should keep an eye on their potential cast members throughout the process, but especially early on when the warning signs are likely easier to spot. While most people can mask their mental health issues, being open with them or finding out what’s going on early can make a big difference in the program.
6
MAFS should require mental health screenings from impartial professionals
They need better ideas about the bigger picture
While it’s unclear who performs the majority of mental health screenings in MAFS, It’s clear that the experts have some time with the participants to find out if they are mentally fit for the series. Married at first sight two resident physicians, Dr. Pepper and Dr. Pia, often do their best to include some mental health practices in their interviews with participants as they move through the early stages of the matchmaking process. Even so, it shouldn’t just be up to them to take care of facilitating mental health.
THE Married at first sight the team must bring in impartial professionals to ensure that their mental health checks and participants’ understanding are fully removed from the MAFS process. Although experts know how to be impartial, there are likely some biases that they are not consciously aware of, influencing their perception of participants during mental health screenings. Ensuring that participants are clear-headed and understand what they are signing up for is essential for the future MAFS success.
5
MAFS must deeply analyze participants’ backgrounds
They need more information about the past
Although the Married at first sight Participants are screened to ensure there are no major red flags in their history. There have been issues where participants failed and tarnished a season. Although things have changed since the show’s early days when participants like Married at first sight Season 2’s Ryan De Nino has been cast, There are still cast members who display some major red flags once in the series. Over the past few seasons, there have been difficult cast members on both sides of the aisle, creating some dangerous drama.
Married at first sight They should focus on vetting their participants to eliminate potentially dangerous cast members and expand their focus to also include people who may be emotionally manipulative. Although physical danger is of utmost importance, many MAFS Participants enter the program having difficulty regulating their emotions based on past experiences, and this can be harmful. The program would do better to get more information about the backgrounds of potential participantsif possible.
4
MAFS must eliminate influence seekers
Multi-state candidates should not be allowed
Although MAFS the cast made it difficult for people showing serious warning signs to join the series. There are different ways people who seek attention rather than affection join the cast. Some Married at first sight participants end up being cast members looking for influence rather than a romantic relationship, in the hopes that appearing on the show will allow them to build a following that they can gain outside of the series. With some MAFS As participants have influence in the pursuit, it can be difficult to tell who is being sincere about their interest and who is not.
Even though I know that Married at first sight There are viewers who can identify the influence seekers in the series, experts are often unable to eliminate the influence seekers from the final cast. Instead of focusing on people who are more genuine in their approach to their MAFS marriage, experts often choose clout seekers instead. Eliminating influence seekersas MAFS Season 18’s fiancé Ikechi, who applied to the show twice before being cast, would be better for the long-term success of the series.
3
MAFS should diversify expert panel
They need different points of view
After years of focusing on similar activities MAFS experts come into the program with intellectual perspectives on what is happening to the participants, the series should diversify its expert panel for good. While previous seasons of the series have brought in other experts with different experiences and perspectives, they have often only had supplemental experts for a few episodes at a time. Instead of bringing them in for the season, the extra specialists are only available for certain situations.
Instead of bringing in new experts with differing opinions in just a few different circumstances, Married at first sight They should recruit their expert panel with a diverse mix of people. Experts coming from sociological backgrounds, from different age groups and nationalities, and from different walks of life would help change things. With more diverse experts, tparticipants would get a variety of views.
2
MAFS should use more psychological practices in its combination
They shouldn’t just limit themselves to talk therapy
Normally, the MAFS Experts use some variations of psychotherapy and couples counseling to advance the process and help couples with various issues. While discussing issues and identifying important problems can be extremely helpful, There are other therapy methods that may be helpful for Married at first sight participantsalso. MAFS participants would be better off in the program if other therapeutic practices were used, especially those that helped specialists understand them psychologically.
Although psychotherapy and counseling techniques should still be used, the Married at first sight specialists could investigate other therapeutic techniques to uncover issues that participants may not even be aware of. By treating the experiment more like an experiment and less like a traditional relationship, MAFS participants may have the opportunity to resolve problems in their marriages. New tactics could help change the perspective on what the MAFS experts can do.
1
MAFS must bring in more experts to be complete
They could do more with a variety of voices
Although the Married at first sight experts are already doing what they can on the series, it would be beneficial to expand their team to give a more complete look at weddings. Although the trio of experts work hard to give each couple their opinion and try to provide them with the tools for success, the experts often seem to be spread thin. With more experts in the program, there could be an interesting split in how they deal with each of the couples.
More MAFS Experts could make the series more interesting as they would come from different perspectives and backgrounds when dealing with each couple’s issues. Although Married at first sight participants would have to do their part and open up about their problems, which MAFS experts with more people involved would make it easier to be continually vulnerable. Expanding the team may not be viable, but MAFS could benefit from this.
Married at first sight airs Tuesdays at 8pm EDT on Lifetime.
Source: Married at first sight/Instagram