$711 million movie proves Game of Thrones’ real Daenerys mistake happened 6 years before Season 8

Game of Thrones Could have handled Daenerys Targaryen’s arc better, and Dunn: Part Two is a great example of how it could have done so. Daenerys becoming the so-called “Mad Queen” and burning King’s Landing is one of the biggest reasons Game of Thrones‘ The end was so controversial, with complaints that it was too sudden a turn and was not properly set up.

I don’t think that the criticism is wrong, although they are not entirely right. Before Daenerys burned King’s Landing, the show showed her tendency for violence and a desire to take what is hers with fire and blood, but it definitely needed to dress in this much harder than it did. However, I don’t think that’s just a fault of Game of Thrones Season 8, but something that dates all the way back to Season 3 instead.

Game of Thrones Season 3’s finale caused problems for Daenerys’ arc

Dany’s “Mhysa” moment was uncomfortable, and created a problem

Game of Thrones Season 3, episode 10, “Mhysa,” ended with what was ostensibly a moment of triumph for Daenerys. Yunkai’s freed slaves get to meet the “Breaker of Chains,” and Danny stood up in the crowd that was singing “Misa,” Which translates as “Mom.”

Of course, the problem with this image should hopefully be obvious: As Daenerys, the white-as-white hero, is hoisted into the air by the poor, grateful people of color she has freed, it definitely carries an air of the white savior emphasis on him. That is, a white person saving or rescuing usually impoverished, somewhat helpless people of color, and it promotes their own moral superiority.

Be generous to Game of ThronesOne can argue that this was a special choice; That any feelings of discomfort as viewers were a feature, not a bug, and that it was setting Daenerys’ doomed arc by showing her mission, while starting from a purely moral point of view in freeing slaves, is deeply flawed. The show had its moments, such as her killing of the slavers in Meereen, but it always worked hard to justify them.

Danny has done terrible things, but is rarely presented as anything less than the heroHer opinion was not challenged by anyone whose opinion audiences would actually consider until much later. It’s not just about the scene in “Mhysa” in isolation, but how it really became the blueprint for Daenerys’ heroism and how it could instead be the springboard for her gradually darker turn.

Dune 2 shows like Game of Thrones could have handled Daenerys’ story better

Paul Atreides’ villainous turn is what Daenerys could have been

There are several parallels between Paul Atreides and Daenerys Targaryen, and broad similarities between Don And Game of Thrones As a whole, though with many differences too. Both Paul and Danny were born of nobility with a claim to rule, removed from their homeworld, and believe themselves to be destined for much greater things, even featuring as the subject of prophecies that would mark them as messianic saviors. Dunn: Part Two Feels more specific in this one, though, with one shot very evocative of “Misa.”

As Paul makes his way through a huge crowd of aliens, on his way to eventually killing Baron Harkonn, I can’t help but be reminded of two things: Daenerys in Yunkai, and Anakin Skywalker with the 501st Legion in The Jedi Temple. Paul Atreides is the dark chosen one Anakin Skywalker never was, however He is also an example of how Game of Thrones Could have leaned much, much more into Daenerys’ own darker traits and actionsRather than holding her as his hero until, well, she’s not.

The pictures of Paul with the glasses really show how much he buys into the prophecy that he is the Lison al-Gayb, and this means that the pictures of him are a terrible reality of what he is becoming; of what he thinks he must become. Through a mix of both show and tell, it is clear to the audience that Paul is on a dark, dangerous path (even as he repeatedly talks about and has visions of it), and through Dunn: Part TwoIn the end, there’s no doubt about it.

Paul is extremely angry at his own fate. There is a tragedy here, because he believes that is the only reason for action, and he tried to resist it before, but he is also consumed with a new power… and this is one that will lead to the deaths of Billions, but the violence and bloodshed is a price he will be willing to pay. Daenerys, too, led people into a war that killed a lot of people (though not as many as Paul’s Unholy War will), but because Doon 2 Is so focused on showing the dangers of Christ figures and hammers home that message, it works brilliantly.

in fairness, Game of Thrones is not as focused on one main character as Don Is. That Is Paul’s story, whereas Game of Thrones‘ cast was even more expansive, and although Daenerys was one of the two main heroes, she shared the title with Jon Snow. Nevertheless, it could have done better.

When Daenerys committed her own harsh acts, although it may be used to show us the route she takes, we say that she was morally superior. Even when she worries about being like her father, we say she won’t be. When Daenerys does something that could be taken as “wrong,” Game of Thrones Said no, she was right… until the last “wrong” thing she did. There is much more power, nuance and understanding in Paul’s own villainous turnWhich shows how Thrones Could have improved things.

Daenerys’ villain arc still works, but it could have been much stronger

Game of Thrones needs to do more

Overall, I actually like Daenerys’ arc Game of Thrones Season 8. Taken on its own terms, I think “The Bells” is a very powerful episode of television, showcasing the horrors of war, the terrifying fury of dragons, and the dark side of destiny, desire, and power when things go wrong. Stopped. Even looking at the context of the whole show, I think Daenerys’ turn is fascinating for her character, and a Mostly Logical endpoint for you.

Even with this, however, it is very clear Game of Thrones Could have done more – the reception shows as such. It’s not just that people would never have accepted it – although some wouldn’t – but that the setup could have been much more open. Again, things like killing the servants, burning the Khals, sending Randyll and Deacon to death, and speeches of burning cities to the ground are good for this direction, but Not enough is done to challenge Danny’s moral opinion Or that these were not justified, isolated incidents, the actions of a just ruler who had to make difficult decisions.

This is not to say that it needed to make Daenerys an outright villain, but it really should have shown the nuances, complexities, and darkness of her character. If it had built from season 3 with a better sense of her misguided notions and failings, and served more as a critique of the white savior trope, then it could have been much stronger. It may be difficult to believe in her own destiny (perhaps bring in more of the prince who is promised prophecy), to make her fall more tragic.

This is something we get along with Dunn: Part TwoAnd although they are different stories headed in different directions, it is better than Game of Thrones Managed with Danny.

• Based on George RR Martin’s novels, the fantasy series follows the power struggles between noble families as they fight for control of the Iron Throne in the Seven Kingdoms of Westeros. The series is known for its complex characters, political intrigue and unexpected plot twists.

• Dune: Part Two continues the epic saga of Paul Atreides as he allies himself with Chani and the Fremen. Pursuing revenge for his family’s destruction, Paul is faced with a momentous decision that affects his personal desires and the future of the universe, and tries to avoid a difficult future that only he expects.