10 Harsh Realities of Replaying Red Dead Redemption

The original Red Dead Redemption is a classic for good reason and still remains one of Rockstar’s best games. It’s an immersive, beautiful, sincere and moving game, full of memorable characters, locations and missions. Veterans of the game probably have fond memories of it and the various tricks they pulled as John Marston when it launched in 2010.

Warning: This article contains spoilers for Red Dead Redemption.

However, now that Red Dead Redemption is on PC and has been released on high-end platforms, playing it might seem like a tempting option. Overall, venture back Red Dead Redemption It’s a great idea, and the game absolutely holds up for the most part. However, like any game from that era, there are some small issues that make replaying a little difficult. While it’s by no means a bad game now, on repeat Red Dead Redemption comes with some caveats.

10

Its open world is very small

It can still feel quite empty

Nowadays, Open world games tend to feel the need to have the biggest world imaginablewith tastes Assassin’s Creed: Valhalla and Tears of the Kingdom offering players truly massive sandboxes to roam around in. Even the best open world games of all time have succumbed to this, which in turn has created an expectation that all open worlds should be like this.

However, the original Red Dead Redemptionalthough relatively large, it is nowhere near as large as more modern AAA titles. Even compared to its sequel, Red Dead Redemption the beautiful open world looks as wide as a puddle. For some, this can be quite refreshing as it can often feel more focused and less busy. However, for those who have become accustomed to today’s larger open worlds, Red Dead Redemption Smaller world can be a shock.

9

Red Dead Redemption 2 is missing a lot of features

It’s hard to get RDR2 out of your head

Red Dead Redemption was a very immersive and realistic open-world game for its time, offering players an unprecedented and exciting cowboy experience. Naturally, since its release in 2010, developers have learned many lessons about open-world games and improved on the mistakes of older titles. This is absolutely the case Red Dead Redemption 2which took everything Rockstar learned from the first game and improved on it.

As a result, playing RDR after playing Red Dead Redemption 2 it may seem like a big shockas it lacks all the features that this title has. While there are actually some features in RDR missing in RDR2there’s even more that’s missing from the original game, from a Wanted system that actually matters to the simple pleasure of fishing. It’s not exactly Red Dead Redemption guilt, but it makes repeating it a little difficult.

8

Its story is not as well told as RDR2

John’s story is amazing, but not as strong as Arthur’s

One of the best aspects Red Dead Redemption is his story, with the central storyline of John and his quest to hunt down his old gang, creating a truly moving and moving experience that still holds up to this day. With brilliant writing and a phenomenal, emotional ending, it’s hard to fault. However, although it is excellent, It’s just not as good or as convincingly told as Red Dead Redemption 2.

Red Dead Redemption 2 has the power of an additional console generation behind it, meaning it could not only present its story with better visuals and a more cinematic feel, but it could also have much more varied missions in a more dynamic world. As a result, your story is given the scope and scale it needs, allowing it to unfold over a much longer period of time and creating the opportunity to better flesh out your characters. RDR2 the story is better because of when it was made, which may return it to the RDR1 Telling stories a little difficult.

7

Hits differently if played after RDR2

Certain characters are ruined

Red Dead Redemption 2 is a prequel to Red Dead Redemption which was made almost a decade later. As such, his characterization and writing for certain characters will be quite different. Although it was obviously made with the first game in mind there are specific characters that look very different, despite the fact that the two games are only a few years apart.

One example is Javier, who is a somewhat likable character in the second game and a rather terrible person in the first. These changes can make reproduction Red Dead Redemption difficult after playing the second game, as it can be difficult to deal with the large character differences. It’s not a huge issue and only affects a few characters, but it’s still a minor issue.

6

Mexico is very boring

It’s a fun but monotonous distraction

Going to Mexico in Red Dead Redemption It’s one of the most memorable moments in the entire gameif not the entire series, especially thanks to “Distant” by José González playing softly in the background. There is a wonderful sense of magic to the entire experience, which feels like the perfect microcosm for the overall atmosphere and vibes in Red Dead Redemption. Even today, thinking about it is enough to give someone goosebumps. It’s excellent.

However, while the experience of venturing into Mexico (and even some of the plot within it) is interesting in Red Dead Redemptiona lot of it feels like an annoying distraction. It never lives up to the expectations it sets and the area itself often feels empty. Repeating RDR and having to venture back to Mexico can seem like a bit of a chorealthough listening to this song never gets old.

5

Rockstar learned many lessons

A lot has changed since 2010

In the interval between RDR1 and RDR2, Rockstar has learned a lot as a developer and developed its passion for realism in video games. As a result, there are many gameplay decisions in the first game that don’t carry over to the second, as they are outdated and no longer taken advantage of. Repeating Red Dead Redemption knowing what Rockstar is capable of now, and was even capable of a few years later RDRs release with GTA V, it can be difficult.

For gamers who enjoy Rockstar’s new vision for their video games, replaying their older titles can be a surreal experience. For example, the disparity between the hilarious, arcade and sometimes silly Intimidating and the heaviest Red Dead Redemption 2 It’s immense. Of course, there isn’t that big of a gap when it comes to Red Dead Redemptionbut still looks very different from modern Rockstar titles.

4

Combat can become repetitive

It depends a lot on the dead eye

THE Red Dead Redemption The games are some of the most immersive open-world action games ever made, but that doesn’t stop them from feeling a little clunky and repetitive. This is especially true for Red Dead Redemptionwhich relies heavily on the Dead Eye feature and it never truly improves the overall flow of the game’s combat throughout its relatively long runtime.

Of course, duels are a lot of fun, and attacking people with a rifle and a revolver never gets old, even at the end of Red Dead Redemption. However, for those more accustomed to modern gaming standards, especially when it comes to third-person shooters, reproducing Red Dead Redemption it will feel limiting and not as fun.

3

Moving John can be clumsy

Has 2010 controls

It’s pretty hard to blame a game released in 2010 for having 2010’s clunky levels, but Red Dead Redemption It’s absolutely a clumsy game. Most of the time, players can have fun exploring the gorgeous open world without much difficulty, but eventually, they’ll run into some old-fashioned noise. John can be a little tricky to get around, especially in cities, and this can sometimes be a little frustrating.

It’s just one of the downsides of playing an old game, and ultimately one of the main reasons why Red Dead Redemption It deserves more than a remaster. While this never truly discourages players, reproducing RDR and trying out some strange movement can be tiring. It’s not the game’s fault, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t annoying from time to time.

2

The twist is ruined

Players already know what happens to John

Red Dead Redemption has one of the best endings in video games, mainly because it’s really moving. Watching John die and then having to play his son is not only an interesting twist, but also an instant hit. When experienced for the first time, it is unexpected and mind-blowing, and it feels fresh and new.

Unfortunately, this feeling is difficult to sustain over repeated playsas the twist of what will eventually happen is completely ruined. Knowing this is coming adds a new layer to the game, but it’s not enough to mitigate the disappointment that comes with having already experienced it once. It’s probably the worst part of repeating Red Dead Redemptionbut that shouldn’t stop players from doing it anyway.

1

It’s never as good the second time

Certain moments just aren’t that strong

All of these inputs culminate in the biggest, harshest reality, and that is the simple fact that reproducing Red Dead Redemption the second, third, fourth or however many times it’s just not as fun or as good as the first time. Of course, the game in general is phenomenal and it’s always great to relive some of the game’s best moments and set pieces, as well as spend time with John.

However, moments like riding into Mexico or watching John get riddled with bullets just don’t hit as hard as they once were. Knowing what happens to each character and when to expect it ruins a lot of the suspense, and experiencing the same missions again makes everything feel a little stale. Ultimately, it’s a problem to replay any game, but it especially hurts with Red Dead Redemption because that first time is truly remarkable.

Sources: YouTube/Rockstar Games, YouTube/thanatogens, YouTube/Up Over Games