10 Biggest Halloween Movie Flops of All Time

0
10 Biggest Halloween Movie Flops of All Time

The Halloween season is a great time for filming, As horror and fall-themed movies often perform well at the box office during these few months. However, films set during Halloween or that use the visual language often seen in these projects can also be considered part of the Halloween canon. Unfortunately, just because a movie is released at this time or uses popular motifs doesn't mean it will do well in theaters. Many legendary movie directors have made box office bombs, because there are a variety of reasons why films don't connect with audiences in theaters.

Many of the most underrated Halloween movies underperformed at the box office. However, they later found cult followings thanks to critical and audience revaluation. Part of the reason streaming is so popular is that it has allowed contemporary audiences to revisit works that weren't given enough attention when they were released. however, Not every movie that bombed at the box office was misunderstood, As there is a reason why audiences are not attracted to a project. When the movies are watched again, it is clear that the quality has not improved over time.

10

Halloween III: Season of the Witch (1982)

Worldwide box office: $14.4 million; Budget: Estimated $2,500,000

The Halloween franchise is one of the most popular and enduring of all time, but at the time of its release, Halloween 3 Quickly claimed the spot as the worst performer at the box office. While it made its money back and wasn't an embarrassment, Based on the success of the first two films, it should have made a lot more money. One of the biggest issues with Halloween 3 was that it was too far from the original premise, because the film does not feature Michael Myers.

Compared to the box office smashes of 1982 vi PoltergeistA much more innovative addition to the horror genre, The Small Sum made by Halloween 3 was unfortunate.

Compared to the box office smashes of 1982 vi PoltergeistA much more innovative addition to the horror genre, The Small Sum made by Halloween 3 was unfortunate. When seen as separate from the Halloween franchise and as a different type of scary movie, There are several parts of Halloween 3 Which are interesting. This includes the strong critiques of contemporary culture from the early 1980s. However, this is not enough to make the audience eager to watch the film.

Title

Rotten Tomatoes Critical Score

Rotten Tomatoes audience score

Halloween III: Season of the Witch (1982)

Related

9

Halloween 5: The Revenge of Michael Myers (1989)

Worldwide box office: $11,642,254; Budget: $5,000,000

Halloween 3 was quickly dethroned as the worst installment of the franchise by Halloween 5 When it was released in 1989. though The universe began to redeem itself with Halloween 4, The studio tried to capitalize on this success too quickly. This means Halloween 5 It wasn't given the time and energy it needed to find its feet. receiving even worse critical reviews than the early failures, Halloween 5 Could have been good but was too messy and disorganized to stand the test of time.

Halloween 5 remains the biggest box office disappointment of the Halloween Franchise And is typically considered one of the worst installments. Until then Halloween 5 was released, over a decade has passed since the release of the first movie, and much of the spark and interest in the universe has died. The aspects of Halloween What made it stand out from typical horror movies of the time has faded, leaving only the name and memory of a better franchise.

Title

Rotten Tomatoes Critical Score

Rotten Tomatoes audience score

Halloween 5: The Revenge of Michael Myers

12%

36%

8

Jennifer's Body (2009)

Worldwide box office: $31,556,061; Budget: $16,000,000

The often-misunderstood and recently reevaluated Jennifer's body has only become a cult classic in the last few years. When the film was released in 2009, critics and audiences did not know what to do Jennifer's bodyAs it was unlike any other horror movie in this period. Megan Fox and Amanda Seyfried star in the feminist horror film It is more concerned with the central relationship between Jennifer (Fox) and Needy (Seyfried), and it is punctuated by the referential style of dialogue of Juno Writer Diablo Cody.

Related

Fox and Seyfried aren't the only great performers in the film, either Jennifer's body is now remembered as one of Adam Brody's best movies for his slimy performance as a demon-summoning band member. much of The underwhelming performance of Jennifer's body Can be attributed to a poor marketing campaign That paints the movie as an exploitation film rather than a critique of how the male gaze affects young women. Thankfully, the project remained relevant despite its poor box office reception.

Title

Rotten Tomatoes Critical Score

Rotten Tomatoes audience score

Jennifer's Body (2009)

46%

35%

7

Practical Magic (1998)

Worldwide box office: $68,336,997; Budget: $60,000,000

Practical Magic is a romantic fantasy film directed by Griffin Dunne, starring Sandra Bullock and Nicole Kidman as sisters Sally and Gillian Owen, born into a family of witches. Living under a curse that condemns every man they fall in love with to an early death, the sisters navigate love, loss and their magical heritage while confronting family secrets and societal prejudices.

Director

Griffin Dunn

Release date

October 16, 1998

Writers

Alice Hoffman, Robin Swickord, Akiba Goldsman, Adam Brooks

runtime

104 minutes

With stars like Nicole Kidman and Sandra Bullock attached to Practical MagicAlong with the built-in audience, who became familiar with the book by Alice Hamann, there was reason to believe that the cat would An autumn hit. however, Practical Magic didn't make enough money to justify his budget, Making it a disaster for the studio, Warner Bros. While more recent reception of the film has been positive and highlights the good aspects of Practical MagicThis does not change his initial failure.

While the atmosphere and aesthetics of Practical Magic are enough Tonally, the movie lacks a cohesive theme. Despite being framed as a romantic comedy with fall influences and supernatural elements, the story takes a dark turn which may have been a reason for the film's inability to connect with audiences. However, there is hope for Practical magic 2Which may retrospectively earn some respect and notoriety for the first movie.

Title

Rotten Tomatoes Critical Score

Rotten Tomatoes audience score

Practical Magic (1998)

25%

73%

6

Pumpkinhead (1988)

Worldwide box office: $4,385,516; Budget: Estimated $3,500,000

Although not released in the fall or close to October, It is difficult to argue that Pumpkinhead is a distinctly Halloween related project. From the name alone, it brings to mind visuals of the pumpkins and jack-o'-lanterns seen everywhere during the fall months. did Pumpkinhead Had it been released closer to this time of year, it could have done better, but the film is still considered a cult classic and a uniquely terrifying monster movie.

The dark and terrifying tone of PumpkinheadCoupled with the tragic ending, it's easy to see why audiences are shocked by and uncertain about the film.

The dark and terrifying tone of PumpkinheadCoupled with the tragic ending, it's easy to see why audiences are shocked by and uncertain about the film. Centering on the creation of a horrifying monster created to carry out a man's desire for revenge in the wake of his grief, The creature design of the titular Pumpkinhead is quite memorable. If audiences went to theaters expect Pumpkinhead To be a traditional horror story with an uplifting ending, this is not what they would have gotten out of Pumpkinhead.

Title

Rotten Tomatoes Critical Score

Rotten Tomatoes audience score

Pumpkinhead (1988)

65%

9%

5

live dark (1987)

Worldwide box office: $3,369,628; Budget: $5,000,000

Near Dark (English: Near Dark) is a 1987 film directed by Kathryn Bigelow that blends elements of horror and the Western genre. The story follows a young man who becomes entangled with a group of nomadic vampires. As he grapples with his newfound condition, the film explores themes of loyalty, survival and identity. Starring Adrian Pasdar, Jenny Wright and Lance Henriksen, Near Dark is known for its atmospheric cinematography and intense performances.

Director

Kathryn Bigelow

Release date

October 2, 1987

Writers

Kathryn Bigelow, Eric Red

Figure

Jenette Goldstein, Jenny Wright, Bill Paxton, Lance Henriksen, Adrian Pasdar

runtime

94 minutes

Thankfully, Kathryn Bigelow's failed vampire movie Live dark Didn't prevent the filmmaker from winning the Academy Award for Best Director for Zero Dark Thirty. however, This early addition to her career was a major flop that failed to recoup its budget at the box office. innovation, Live dark Still had many positive reviews and was considered a nuanced blend of genres for the late 1980s, but the independent project could not compete with more high-profile vampire projects.

Despite its Gothic elements, much of Live dark is a love story, And the elements of the Western genre are in conversation with many of the prominent films of the 1980s. Life is dark is a great example of a film that has cultivated a cult following in the years since its release because of how underrated the project was at the time of its release. Its limited release and run also contributed to the poor performance.

Title

Rotten Tomatoes Critical Score

Rotten Tomatoes audience score

live dark (1987)

83%

74%

4

The Thing (2011)

Worldwide box office: $27,573,078; Budget: $38,000,000

There is no reason to try and recreate the magic of John Carpenter's 1982 The thingAnd the unfortunate failure of the 2011 iteration proves it. While it's not the worst horror remake of all time, It did not have the revival that the 1982 film enjoyed. Taking on a remake of a film as synonymous with history as Carpenter's work is a risky move, and The thing Couldn't carve a unique niche for itself in the box office landscape.

It's likely that most of the audience that showed up to support the film were familiar with the 1982 iteration, as name recognition is a huge part of getting viewers in seats. While VFX has come a long way since the 1980s, The practical effect of the 1982 The thing are still far superior to the CGI used in the 2011 version. If anything, the effects that bring the creature to life in the 2011 The thing Alienate the audience and make the film feel detached from reality.

Title

Rotten Tomatoes Critical Score

Rotten Tomatoes audience score

The Thing (2011)

34%

43%

3

I Still Know What You Did Last Summer (1998)

Worldwide box office: $40,002,112; Budget: $65,000,000

I still know what you did last summer

Director

Danny Cannon

Release date

November 13, 1998

Writers

Lois Duncan, Trey Callaway

Figure

Jennifer Love Hewitt, Freddie Prinze Jr., Brandy Norwood, Mekhi Phifer, Muse Watson, Bill Cobbs

runtime

100 minutes

After the success of the teen horror flick, I know what you did last summerIt makes sense that the studio wanted to capitalize on the interest of the original film. However, the sequel I still know what you did last summerWas as awkward and unnecessary as his title, forgotten. While the campy and silly elements are what made it I know what you did last summer So much fun, the sequel fails to capture any of that joy and is left with an empty remake.

While there's still a lot of love for the original, the sequel has been overlooked for good reason.

Although Jennifer Love Hewitt and Freddie Prinze Jr. have returned for the sequel, Their characters didn't have much more to learn and ended after the first movie. After spending a significant amount of money in developing this project, the poor reception ended any chance of further installments hitting theaters during this time. While there's still a lot of love for the original, the sequel has been overlooked for good reason. Even with a lot of jumpscars, shock and gore, I still know what you did last summer Can't find an audience base.

Title

Rotten Tomatoes Critical Score

Rotten Tomatoes audience score

I Still Know What You Did Last Summer (1998)

7%

29%

2

The Crow (2024)

Worldwide box office: $23,900,925; Budget: $50,000,000

The Crow (2024) is a dark and gritty reimagining of the original graphic novel. It follows Eric, who has been resurrected from the dead to avenge his and his soulmate's brutal murder. Armed with supernatural abilities, Eric seeks justice against the killers responsible, navigating through a corrupt city that is as much a character as he is. This adaptation introduces new elements to capture the modern audience!

Director

Rupert Sanders

Release date

August 23, 2024

Writers

James O'Barr, Zach Baylin

Figure

Bill Skarsgard, FKA Twigs, Danny Huston, Josette Simon, Laura Birn, Sami Bouajila, Jordan Bolger, Karel Dobrý.

runtime

111 minutes

Remakes and sequels can be smash hits at the box office and make a lot of money for studios or be unfavorably compared to their predecessors and bomb financially. unfortunately, The Crow Can't live up to the high bar that the original 1994 film set, Even though the creative choices behind the project worked effectively to make the 2024 movie feel like a different take on the story. While Bill Skarsgård and FKA Twigs did well in their respective roles, it wasn't enough to save the movie.

It hasn't been in theaters for long, like The film was released in late August and then pulled from theaters and made available digitally in mid-September. Although this was a quick turnaround, it was a smart decision by the studio to avoid losing more money. Poor critical reception and the shadow of the first movie made it impossible for The Crow To be a success, although it could have become a fun spin on the superhero genre with supernatural thriller elements for the Halloween season.

Title

Rotten Tomatoes Critical Score

Rotten Tomatoes audience score

The Crow (2024)

23%

64%

Worldwide box office: $18,902,015; Budget: $40,000,000

feardotcom is very much of its time, as in 2002, The fear and anxiety surrounding the digital age and the increased prevalence of the Internet are only increasing. The plot revolves around a detective investigating a series of deaths linked to a terrifying website. Although the premise is not bad in and of itself, feardotcom did not meet the expectations. Not even recouping half of its budget, it may be one of the worst-received horror movies of its time.

feardotcom Did not manage to break into new territory for the horror genre Or use its technological themes to relate to contemporary issues. This did not help feardotcom was a graphic and violent project that did not justify its grotesque image with strong messages or a compelling script. Although some movies deserve to be reevaluated despite their poor performance, feardotcom is better left behind in favor of more intriguing films that better understand the intersection of horror and the Internet.

Title

Rotten Tomatoes Critical Score

Rotten Tomatoes audience score

Feardotcom (2002)

3%

18%

Sources: The numbers, Box Office MojoAnd IMDB